Table 1.
Variable | M | SD | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Child age | 12.29 | 0.81 | |||||||
2. Parent age | 42.93 | 7.03 | .14 | ||||||
[−.05, .33] | |||||||||
3. Child race (% White) | 69% | -- | −.15 | −.14 | |||||
(0=White; 1=nonWhite) | [−.33, .04] | [−.33, .05] | |||||||
4. Parent race (% White) | 77% | -- | −.16 | −.16 | .82** | ||||
(0=White; 1=nonWhite) | [−.34, .04] | [−.34, .04] | [.74, .87] | ||||||
5.Socioeconomic status | 7.20 | 3.02 | .10 | .32** | −.25* | −.30** | |||
[−.10, .28] | [.14, .48] | [−.42, −.06] | [−.47, −.11] | ||||||
6. Pubertal status | 3.57 | 1.02 | .47** | .03 | −.02 | −.05 | −.08 | ||
[.31, .61] | [−.17, .22] | [−.21, .18] | [−.25, .15] | [−.27, .12] | |||||
7. Rumination | 48.41 | 21.06 | .16 | −.21* | .07 | .05 | −.13 | .07 | |
[−.04, .34] | [−.39, −.02] | [−.13, .25] | [−.15, .24] | [−.32, .06] | [−.13, .26] | ||||
8. Problem-solving | 7.97 | 1.84 | .13 | −.08 | −.04 | −.04 | −.07 | −.03 | .28** |
[−.07, .31] | [−.27, .12] | [−.23, .16] | [−.24, .16] | [−.26, .13] | [−.23, .16] | [.09, .45] |
Note. N=97. M and SD are used to represent mean and standard deviation, respectively. Values in square brackets indicate the 95% confidence interval for each correlation. The confidence interval is a plausible range of population correlations that could have caused the sample correlation (Cumming, 2014).
indicates p < .05.
indicates p < .01. Pubertal status=PDS (Shirtcliff et al., 2009); Rumination=CRSS rumination subscale; Problem-solving=RSQ problem-solving subscale.