Table 3.
Economic rent of the agricultural and nature management activities (USD/ha/year) specified for common open habitat types and forests. Source: Own calculations based on Thomsen et al. (2018)
| Economic rent of the agricultural and nature management activities, USD/ha per year | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crop prod. in rotation | 632 | – | – | – |
| Nature management | Meadow | Bog and Heath | Grassland | Salt march |
| Summer grazing, cattle | − 1216 | − 268 | − 774 | − 505 |
| Haymaking | − 189 | − 205 | − 205 | − 205 |
| Year-round grazing, cattle | − 253 | − 32 | − 126 | − 79 |
| Economic rent of the forest activities, USD/ha per year | ||
|---|---|---|
| Case areas | All standing volume is left | 200 m3/ha of the standing volume is left |
| 1. Rebild forest | 347 | 284 |
| 2. Nørlund plantation and heath | 142 | 126 |
| 3. Saltbæk Bay | 268 | 268 |
| 4. Mols hills | 221 | 205 |
| Perimeter and cost of fencing in the year-round grazing and rewilding scenarios | ||
|---|---|---|
| Case areas | Perimeter, km | Fencing cost, 1000 USD/year |
| 1. Rebild forest | 25.2 | 44 |
| 2. Nørlund plantation and heath | 24.3 | 42 |
| 3. Saltbæk Bay | 19.2 | 33 |
| 4. Mols hills | 13.1 | 23 |
The cost of fencing is based on an approximation based on the cost of fencing a rectangular area of similar size and the actual geographical areas (polygons)