Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 1;18(3):e2454. doi: 10.30498/IJB.2020.154641.2454

Table 1.

Effect of different concentration of MitoQ in maturation media on mouse oocytes developmental competence, compared to in vivo-control, in vitro-control and sham groups.

In vivo-control In vitro-control Sham MitoQ (0.01 µM) MitoQ (0.02 µM) MitoQ (0.04 µM)
Maturation rate ---- 71.14 ± 0.91 69.25 ± 1.38 89.01 ± 1.40 a 92.6 ± 0.92a 83.05 ± 0.91c
Matured (per initiated) 178 156 163 169 153 171
Fertilization rate (%) 92.1±1.90a 78.84 ± 1.54 77.91 ± 1.31 85.79 ± 2.20 90.19 ± 2.01a 80.7 ± 1.58
Cleavage rate (%) 88 ± 2.48 a 65.75 ± 2.49 63.75 ± 1.31 76.66 ± 1.75 cd 80.62 ± 1.67ad 68 ± 1.47
Blastulation (%) 83 ± 2.48 b 58 ± 2.16 57.25 ± 2.56 73.5 ± 2.62 cd 81.66 ± 1.85b 64 ± 3.02

Each experiment involved four replicates. Mean ± SEM

Each experiment involved four replicates. Mean ± SEM

aP ≤ 0.01 versus in vitro-control and sham

bP ≤ 0.01 versus in vitro-control, sham, 0.01 and 0.04 μM MitoQ

cP ≤ 0.05 versus in vitro-control and sham

dP ≤ 0.05 versus 0.04 μM MitoQ