TABLE 1.

RE‐AIM framework to evaluate implementation of pedaling for Parkinson's™

Domain	Definition	Study population(s)	Study measures
Reach	The proportion of the targeted population that receives the intervention	Participants	# participated/# screened for participation
Effectiveness	Clinical effectiveness of the intervention	Participants	MDS‐UPDRS III a (motor outcome) TUG b (motor outcome) TRAILS A&B c (motor & cognitive outcome) PROMIS sf v1.0 d (quality of life outcome)
	Acceptability/enjoyment of the intervention	Participants	Likert scale & free‐text questions
		Gyms	Likert scale & free‐text questions
Adoption	The proportion of sites or individuals in sites willing to initiate the intervention	Gyms	# gyms who implemented the program/# of potential participating gyms
Implementation	Fidelity to the implementation strategies	Gyms‐fidelity	Direct observation of classes Cadence Rating of perceived exertion
		Participants‐fidelity (adherence)	# who did not withdraw from the study, were not lost to follow up, and completed at least 80% of the sessions/# who started study
	Cost of the implementation strategy	Cost‐implementation	Estimated based on study staff record of implementation strategy cost
		Cost‐participants	Estimated based on a post study survey querying gyms and participants about incurred costs
Maintenance	Sustainability of the intervention with time	Gyms	# offering classes 8 weeks post/# who participated in study
		Participants	# participating in HCC 8 weeks post/# who participated in study

^aMDS‐UPDRS III: Movement Disorder Society—Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale‐Part III.

^bTUG: Timed Up and Go.

^cTRAILS A & B: Trail Making Test, Parts A & B.

^dPROMIS: Participant‐Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System.