Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 29;7(3):e06592. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06592

Table 7.

Effect of social capital on food security of cocoa-based farming households.

Variables Basic model
Additive model
Multiplicative model
Model with instrumental variable
Model with interaction of social capital with unobservables
Coefficient t-stat Coefficient t-stat Coefficient t-stat Coefficient t-stat Coefficient t-stat
Gender 0.874 0.94 0.515 1.30 0.573 1.48 0.341 0.82 0.247 0.58
Age -0.394∗∗∗ -2.83 -0.583 -0.94 -0.884 ∗∗∗ -3.56 -0.406 ∗∗∗ -2.68 0.281 0.83
Household size -0.527∗∗∗ -2.82 -0.695∗∗ -2.15 -0.601 -0.80 -0.441 ∗∗∗ -3.14 -0168 -1.48
Illiterate -0.775∗∗ -2.07 -0.069 -1.15 -0.817∗∗ -2.11 -0.225 ∗∗ -2.35 -0.537 ∗∗ -2.39
Primary education 0.512∗∗ 2.03 1.499∗∗ 2.65 0.524∗∗ 2.07 0.399 ∗∗ 2.04 0.438 ∗∗ 2.45
Secondary education 0.551∗∗ 2.18 0.698∗ 1.82 0.551∗∗ 2.18 0.128 ∗∗∗ 3.61 0.557 ∗∗∗ 2.68
Tertiary education 0.158 1.70 0.212 0.89 0.157 1.64 0.497 0.38 0.317 1.69∗
Marital status 0.270 0.67 0.150 1.53 0.156 0.13 0.382 1.60 0.274 0.86
Farm size 0.834∗∗∗ 3.85 0.841 0.85 0.255 ∗∗∗ 2.90 0.287 0.17 0.241 ∗∗ 2.29
Farm productivity 0.307 ∗∗∗ 3.45 0.432 1.58 0.329 ∗∗∗ 3.18 0.185 ∗∗∗ 3.29 0.143 ∗∗∗ 3.35
Asset 0.663 1. 54 0.127 ∗∗∗ 3.21 0.675 ∗∗∗ 3.56 0.0177 0.15 0.175 ∗∗∗ 3.31
Savings 0.125∗∗∗ 3.14 0.276 ∗∗∗ 3.11 0.226 1.45 0.144 ∗∗∗ 2.73 0.137 ∗∗∗ 2.94
Primary occupation 0.153 1.08 0.160 0.76 0.146 0.45 0.499 1.32 0.297 1.23
Distance to farm -0.247 -0.89 -0.329 -0.40 -0.572 ∗∗ -2.04 -0.633 -0.90 -0.489∗∗∗ -3.53
Meeting attendance 0.269∗∗ 2.47
Decision making 0.819∗∗ 2.30
Cash contribution 0.401∗∗∗ 2.55
Membership density 0.161∗∗∗ 2.76
Labour contribution 0.703 1.51
Heterogeneity 0.644 1.07
Aggregate social capital 0.807∗∗∗ 3.43
Instrumented social capital 0.861∗∗∗ 2.86
Social capital × social capital residual 0.428∗∗∗ 3.49
Constant 2.703∗∗∗ 5.22 3.387 2.81 2.689 5.16 3.373 ∗∗∗ 3.32 2.647∗∗∗ 3.86
Adjusted R2 0.237 0.379 0.254 0.249 0.292
Chi2 33.36∗∗∗ 45.50∗∗∗ 48.91∗∗∗ 44.62∗∗∗ 48.76∗∗∗

∗significance at 10 percent, ∗∗ significance at 5 percent, ∗∗∗ significance at 1 percent Source: Field survey, 2018