Table 2.
Change in the proportion of facilities meeting specific benchmarks for call back and cancer detection in the Chicago Breast Cancer Quality Consortium (2006-2013).
Number of time points available for analysis |
Recall Rate | Biopsy recommendation Rate |
Cancer∣Abnormal (PPV1) |
Cancer∣Biopsied (PPV3) |
Screen Detection Rate |
Proportion Minimal | Proportion early stage | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Na | %b | Pc | Na | %b | Pd | Na | %b | Pc | Na | %b | Pc | Na | %b | Pc | Na | %b | Pc | Na | %b | Pc | |
2 time points | 0.07 | 0.15 | |||||||||||||||||||
1 | 53 | 64 | 53 | 55 | 53 | 36 | 53 | 45 | 53 | 60 | 53 | 68 | 53 | 68 | |||||||
2 | 53 | 66 | 53 | 47 | 53 | 51 | 53 | 38 | 53 | 72 | 53 | 68 | 53 | 70 | |||||||
3 time points | 0.06 | 0.01 | 0.06 | ||||||||||||||||||
1 | 20 | 50 | 20 | 40 | 20 | 55 | 20 | 45 | 20 | 60 | 20 | 60 | 20 | 60 | |||||||
2 | 20 | 45 | 20 | 40 | 20 | 60 | 20 | 60 | 20 | 65 | 20 | 80 | 20 | 95 | |||||||
3 | 20 | 55 | 20 | 70 | 20 | 55 | 20 | 45 | 20 | 75 | 20 | 90 | 20 | 85 | |||||||
4 time points | 0.03 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||||||||||||||||||
1 | 16 | 56 | 16 | 69 | 16 | 44 | 16 | 25 | 16 | 50 | 16 | 25 | 16 | 31 | |||||||
2 | 16 | 56 | 16 | 50 | 16 | 44 | 16 | 44 | 16 | 50 | 16 | 63 | 16 | 56 | |||||||
3 | 16 | 50 | 16 | 50 | 16 | 69 | 16 | 50 | 16 | 69 | 16 | 88 | 16 | 81 | |||||||
4 | 16 | 56 | 16 | 63 | 16 | 31 | 16 | 38 | 16 | 75 | 16 | 88 | 16 | 94 | |||||||
5 time points | 0.03 | 0.02 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||||||||||||||||
1 | 25 | 56 | 25 | 60 | 25 | 40 | 25 | 52 | 25 | 72 | 25 | 24 | 25 | 16 | |||||||
2 | 25 | 84 | 25 | 72 | 25 | 88 | 25 | 64 | 25 | 84 | 25 | 64 | 25 | 52 | |||||||
3 | 25 | 76 | 25 | 64 | 25 | 56 | 25 | 76 | 25 | 64 | 25 | 96 | 25 | 96 | |||||||
4 | 25 | 76 | 25 | 64 | 25 | 80 | 25 | 80 | 25 | 88 | 25 | 96 | 25 | 100 | |||||||
5 | 25 | 68 | 25 | 72 | 25 | 72 | 25 | 72 | 25 | 84 | 25 | 92 | 25 | 92 | |||||||
Combined | 0.17 | 0.005 | 0.007 | 0.004 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||||||||||||||
1 | 114 | 59 | 114 | 55 | 114 | 41 | 114 | 44 | 114 | 61 | 114 | 51 | 114 | 50 | |||||||
2 | 114 | 65 | 114 | 52 | 114 | 60 | 114 | 48 | 114 | 70 | 114 | 68 | 114 | 68 | |||||||
3 | 61 | 62 | 61 | 62 | 61 | 59 | 61 | 59 | 61 | 69 | 61 | 92 | 61 | 89 | |||||||
4 | 41 | 68 | 41 | 63 | 41 | 61 | 41 | 63 | 41 | 83 | 41 | 93 | 41 | 98 | |||||||
5 | 25 | 68 | 25 | 72 | 25 | 72 | 25 | 72 | 25 | 84 | 25 | 92 | 25 | 92 |
Number of facilities with data at specified time points.
Percentage of facilities meeting the benchmark at each time point.
P-values from a Wald test for trend via logistic regression with generalized estimating equations to account for clustering by facility. All P-values >0.20 are suppressed. Abbreviations: PPV1, positive predictive value 1; PPV3 positive predictive value 3.