Table 2.
Derivation method | Threshold | n positive (%) | Kappa (95% CI) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Visual assessment | 38 (24%) | |||
BPND | Low K-means | 0.19 | 41 (25%) | 0.65 (0.51–0.79) |
GMM | 0.23 | 30 (19%) | 0.70 (0.57–0.84) | |
High K-means | 0.29 | 26 (16%) | 0.65 (0.51–0.80) | |
SUVr | Low K-means | 1.28 | 37 (23%) | 0.60 (0.45–0.75) |
GMM | 1.34 | 25 (15%) | 0.63 (0.48–0.78) | |
High K-means | 1.43 | 22 (14%) | 0.60 (0.44–0.75) |
Cohen’s kappa was used to determine the degree of concordance between visual assessment and the six different thresholds
BPND binding potential, GMM Gaussian mixture modelling, SUVr standardized uptake value ratio