Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 4;48(3):747–756. doi: 10.1007/s00259-020-05012-5

Table 2.

Cut-off values for different methods

Derivation method Threshold n positive (%) Kappa (95% CI)
Visual assessment 38 (24%)
BPND Low K-means 0.19 41 (25%) 0.65 (0.51–0.79)
GMM 0.23 30 (19%) 0.70 (0.57–0.84)
High K-means 0.29 26 (16%) 0.65 (0.51–0.80)
SUVr Low K-means 1.28 37 (23%) 0.60 (0.45–0.75)
GMM 1.34 25 (15%) 0.63 (0.48–0.78)
High K-means 1.43 22 (14%) 0.60 (0.44–0.75)

Cohen’s kappa was used to determine the degree of concordance between visual assessment and the six different thresholds

BPND binding potential, GMM Gaussian mixture modelling, SUVr standardized uptake value ratio