Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 26;21(7):2326. doi: 10.3390/s21072326

Table 1.

Automated keratoconus detection methods.

Reference Achievement Method Dataset Results
[5] Dhaini, A.R.; et al., 2018 Corneal haze and demarcation line measurement. Image analysis and machine learning 140 Keratoconus eyes for actual patients The mean demarcation line is 295.9 ± 59.8 microns, and it is 314.5 ± 48.4 microns by medical personal.
[6] Daud, M.M.; et al., 2020 Keratoconus
detection method
Digital image analysis processing 140 cases captured by smartphone Accuracy of 96.03%
[7] Ali, A.H.; et al., 2018 Keratoconus supervised learning and detection Support vector machine using image processing techniques 240 cases were attained from Al-Amal Eye Clinic in Baghdad utilizing a Pentacam Accuracy of 90%
[9] Askarian, B.; et al., 2018 Diagnostic method for keratoconus detection Usage of a smartphone 175 images of keratoconus cases Accuracies of 93%, 67% in severe, and moderate cases, respectively.
The proposed method Automated keratoconus
detection
Depth calculation from 3D corneal image and machine learning 268 Corneal images of Keratoconus and normal cases Accuracy is 97.8%