Table 1.
Reference | Achievement | Method | Dataset | Results |
---|---|---|---|---|
[5] Dhaini, A.R.; et al., 2018 | Corneal haze and demarcation line measurement. | Image analysis and machine learning | 140 Keratoconus eyes for actual patients | The mean demarcation line is 295.9 ± 59.8 microns, and it is 314.5 ± 48.4 microns by medical personal. |
[6] Daud, M.M.; et al., 2020 | Keratoconus detection method |
Digital image analysis processing | 140 cases captured by smartphone | Accuracy of 96.03% |
[7] Ali, A.H.; et al., 2018 | Keratoconus supervised learning and detection | Support vector machine using image processing techniques | 240 cases were attained from Al-Amal Eye Clinic in Baghdad utilizing a Pentacam | Accuracy of 90% |
[9] Askarian, B.; et al., 2018 | Diagnostic method for keratoconus detection | Usage of a smartphone | 175 images of keratoconus cases | Accuracies of 93%, 67% in severe, and moderate cases, respectively. |
The proposed method | Automated keratoconus detection |
Depth calculation from 3D corneal image and machine learning | 268 Corneal images of Keratoconus and normal cases | Accuracy is 97.8% |