Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 24;21(7):2267. doi: 10.3390/s21072267

Table 6.

Comparison of various studies for detecting the concentration between the glucose dissolved in water solutions in terms of sensitivity and concentration range.

Ref. Sensor Sample Containers Sensing Method Bare Sensor fo (GHz) f0 mg/dL (GHz) fmax (GHz) Δf (MHz) Sensitivity (MHz/mg·dL1) Normalized Sensitivity Per (mg·dL1) Concentration (mg/dL)
[105] CE-LC resonator Microfluidic PDMS channel fr 1.67 1.167 1.39 230 MHz 0.023 1.34 × 105 0–10,000 *
[83] SRR with IDC Microfluidic PDMS channel fr & S21 4.18 1.327 1.457 130 0.026 6.22 × 106 0–5000
[106] RF/microwave single-port resonator Non-invasive fr & S11 4.8 3.427 3.441 14 0.014 2.92 × 106 0–1000
[68] ENG unit-cell resonator PDMS cavity fr & S21 2.09 1.91 2.05 140 1.4/0.014 6.70 × 106 0–10,000 *
1.42 1.59 170 1.7/0.017 8.13 × 106
[107] CSRR PDMS microfluidic channel and PMMA frame fr & S11 2.6 2.48 2.5194 39.4 0.4925/0.00493 1.89 × 106 500–8000 *
[108] Open loop resonator Glass capillary fr & Q 2 1.10929 1.10938 0.09 0.000023 1.13 × 108 0–4000
[104] Mediator-free resonator Droplet on the sensing area fr & S21 1.5 0.38 0.875 495 0.99 6.60 × 104 30–500 *
[65] RML resonator with IPD Droplet on the sensing area fr 9.2 9.14 8.68 460 0.92 1.00 × 104 25–500

* The concentration range is changed from mL to dL where 1 dL = 100 mL.