Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 28;18(7):3503. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073503

Table 1.

Intergroup Comparison of Sociodemographic Variables: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) (Absence and Presence) and Obesity (Absence and Presence).

T2DM Intergroup Comparisons Effect Sizes
Absence
(G1)
n = 250
Presence
(G2)
n = 57
M (SD) M (SD) t (p) Cohen’s d
Age 51.3
(12.0)
58.3
(11.5)
t(1, 305) = −4.04
(<0.001)
−0.60 M
% % χ2 (p) Cohen’s w
Gender χ2(1) = 0.64
(0.422)
0.05 N
Male 63.6 57.9
Female 36.4 42.1
Marital status χ2(1) = 0.75
(0.386)
0.05 N
With partner 77.2 82.5
Without partner 22.8 17.5
Education χ2(2) = 1.92
(0.383)
0.08 N
Low 37.6 47.4
Medium 31.6 28.1
High 30.8 24.6
Employment χ2(1) = 4.39
(0.036)
0.12 S
Working 60.8 45.6
Not working 39.2 54.4
Obesity Intergroup Comparisons Effect Sizes
Absence
(G3)
n = 165
Presence
(G4)
n = 142
M (SD) M (SD) t (p) Cohen’s d
Age 52.0
(12.4)
53.2
(11.9)
t(1, 305) = −0.86
(0.391)
−0.10 N
% % χ2 (p) Cohen’s w
Gender χ2(1) = 0.04
(0.848)
0.01 N
Male 63.0 62.0
Female 37.0 38.0
Marital status χ2(1) = 0.08
(0.780)
−0.02 N
With partner 78.8 77.5
Without partner 21.2 22.5
Education χ2(2) = 2.73
(0.256)
0.09 N
Low 43.0 35.2
Medium 30.9 31.0
High 26.1 33.8
Employment χ2(1) = 2.16
(0.142)
0.08 N
Working 61.8 53.5
Not working 38.2 46.5

Note. N: null effect size; S: small effect size; M: medium effect size. The independent sample t-test (age), and Pearson’s Chi-square (categorical variables) were applied.