Table 1.
T2DM | Intergroup Comparisons | Effect Sizes | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Absence (G1) n = 250 |
Presence (G2) n = 57 |
|||
M (SD) | M (SD) | t (p) | Cohen’s d | |
Age | 51.3 (12.0) |
58.3 (11.5) |
t(1, 305) = −4.04 (<0.001) |
−0.60 M |
% | % | χ2 (p) | Cohen’s w | |
Gender | χ2(1) = 0.64 (0.422) |
0.05 N | ||
Male | 63.6 | 57.9 | ||
Female | 36.4 | 42.1 | ||
Marital status | χ2(1) = 0.75 (0.386) |
0.05 N | ||
With partner | 77.2 | 82.5 | ||
Without partner | 22.8 | 17.5 | ||
Education | χ2(2) = 1.92 (0.383) |
0.08 N | ||
Low | 37.6 | 47.4 | ||
Medium | 31.6 | 28.1 | ||
High | 30.8 | 24.6 | ||
Employment | χ2(1) = 4.39 (0.036) |
0.12 S | ||
Working | 60.8 | 45.6 | ||
Not working | 39.2 | 54.4 | ||
Obesity | Intergroup Comparisons | Effect Sizes | ||
Absence
(G3) n = 165 |
Presence
(G4) n = 142 |
|||
M (SD) | M (SD) | t (p) | Cohen’s d | |
Age | 52.0 (12.4) |
53.2 (11.9) |
t(1, 305) = −0.86 (0.391) |
−0.10 N |
% | % | χ2 (p) | Cohen’s w | |
Gender | χ2(1) = 0.04 (0.848) |
0.01 N | ||
Male | 63.0 | 62.0 | ||
Female | 37.0 | 38.0 | ||
Marital status | χ2(1) = 0.08 (0.780) |
−0.02 N | ||
With partner | 78.8 | 77.5 | ||
Without partner | 21.2 | 22.5 | ||
Education | χ2(2) = 2.73 (0.256) |
0.09 N | ||
Low | 43.0 | 35.2 | ||
Medium | 30.9 | 31.0 | ||
High | 26.1 | 33.8 | ||
Employment | χ2(1) = 2.16 (0.142) |
0.08 N | ||
Working | 61.8 | 53.5 | ||
Not working | 38.2 | 46.5 |
Note. N: null effect size; S: small effect size; M: medium effect size. The independent sample t-test (age), and Pearson’s Chi-square (categorical variables) were applied.