Table 2.
Authors | Materials | Process | Advantages | Disadvantages |
---|---|---|---|---|
Takeshita et al. [17] | CS | Air-drying; Freeze-drying; SC-CO2 drying |
Presence of a suitable nanostructure during SC-CO2 drying | Structural degradation during freeze-drying and air-drying; Smooth pores surface for freeze-drying and SC-CO2 drying |
Conzatti et al. [18] | CS/ALG | Air-drying; Freeze-drying; SC-CO2 drying |
Mesoporosity was obtained by freeze-drying and SC-CO2 drying | Not presence of porosity after air-drying |
Gupta and Nayak [23] | KRT/ALG | Freeze-drying | High level of porosity | Time-consuming process; Polydisperse macropores size distribution |
Baldino et al. [27] | ALG/GLT | SC-CO2 drying | Possible modulation of morphology and mechanical properties of polymeric blends; Presence of nanopores and homogenous structure; Good polymer dispersion |
Long time process to completely remove GTA traces |
Baldino et al. [54] | CS | SC-CO2 drying | Removal of GTA during the process; Presence of nanoporous structure; Good definition of cells three-dimensional scaffolds orientation |
Absence of microporosity |
Kazimierczak et al. [77] | CS/AGR/HAp | Gas foaming + Freeze-drying | Good value of porosity | Presence of closed pores; Complex process |
Baldino et al. [79] | CS/GLT | SC-CO2 drying | Possibility to obtain different levels of microporosity and nanoporosity changing polymeric blend compositions; Good mechanical properties |
Possible phenomena of separation between the two biopolymers increasing the relative concentrations |
Tohamy et al. [93] | SALG/Hydroxyethylcellulose/HAp | Freeze-drying + Cross-linking with Ca2+ | Improved good mechanical properties | Disomogenous macroporosity and absence of nanoporous structure for cell attachment |
Purohit et al. [94] | GO/GLT/ALG | Freeze-drying | Suitable swelling profile | Morphology mainly represented by closed pores |
Afshar and Ghaee [95] | CS/ALG/HNT | Freeze-drying + Amination reaction | Homogenous porous structure; Good biochemical characteristics |
Complex and time-consuming process |
Martins et al. [96] | CAALG/STR | SC-CO2 drying using three different depressurization rates | Good biocompatibility; Good bioactivity |
Not presence of nanoporous structure |
Tsiourvas et al. [99] | Nano-HAp/CS | Freeze-drying | Open interconnected highly porous structure; Improved mechanical properties of CS |
Disomogenous macroporosity; HA microparticles were not homogenously dispersed |
Serra et al. [100] | CS/GLT/β-TCP | Ionic cross-linking + Freeze-drying | Improved mechanical properties of CS after the addition of GLT and β-TCP; Good level of biomineralization |
Drastic decrease in porosity after TCP addition |
Nath et al. [102] | BMP-2/CS/HA/Genipin | Freeze-drying | Cross-linking of CS-HA improved the PEC stability in aqueous solution | Burst effect was detected for all samples |
Adhikari et al. [103] | CS/CMC/MgG | Freeze-drying | MgG decreased water adsorption of CS scaffolds; Presence of macroporosity and smaller inner pores |
Time-consuming process; Burst effect during MgG release |
Liu et al. [104] | ALG/CS | Freeze-drying | Good bioactivity of the scaffolds | Samples collapse after processing |
Shi et al. [105] | ALG–DA/QCS templated HAp | Iterative layering freeze-drying + Crosslinking by Ca2+ | Presence of a layered microstructure | Complex process; Uncontrolled degradation profile; Burst effect during levofloxacin release |
Kolanthai et al. [106] | SALG/CS/CLG | Freeze-drying | Controlled swelling profile; Improvement of mechanical properties; Good support for cells growth and osteogenic differentiation |
The use of a chemical cross-linker resulted in a loss of interconnectivity and in a loss of nanofibrous structure |
Yilmaz et al. [108] | CS/GO/HAp | SC-CO2 drying | Improved tensile strength of CS scaffolds | Possible residues of GTA; Limitation in GO wt.% used because it can be cytotoxic for living cells; Not presence of nanopores |
Baldino et al. [109] | CS | SFEP | Possible modulation of morphology; Uniform structure; High interconnectivity; Presence of micropores and nanopores |
Time-consuming process |
Ozdemir et al. [110] | CS | Freeze-drying; SC-CO2 drying |
Smaller and more uniform structure after SC-CO2 drying | Not uniform structure during freeze-drying |
Luo et al. [116] | NG/HAp/AGR | Hydrothermal + Cross-linking + Freeze-drying | Good mechanical properties | Large pores with irregular shape |
Sivashankari and Prabaharan [117] | AGR/CS | Freeze-drying | Good swelling properties; Good mechanical properties; Good bioactivity |
The effect of GO on the porosity did not show a precise trend |