Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 27;18(7):3478. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073478

Table 1.

Procedures, methods and indicators for quality assurance (QA) and quality control (QC) of mosquito surveillance and control programs in Europe.

Procedure Methods Quality Assurance (QA) Quality Control (QC)
Long term surveillance Egg monitoring (ovitraps) Evaluate the sampling plan; estimate the trap coverage or number of “sampling units” and the trap management plan; estimate the monitoring effort and cost Assessment of trap/sampling performance; timeliness and quality of data reporting (e.g., databases, maps)
Larval monitoring (water netting or dipping)
Adult monitoring (host seeking, adult resting, adult trapping)
Insecticide treatment Biocides (larvicides) Mapping of potential breeding sites; environmental and health safety; genotypic and phenotypic insecticide resistance; estimate the treatment effort and economic cost and contrast them against planning Assessment of live larvae in breeding sites and/or adult emergence; analysis of larvae population dynamics and growth; biocides efficacy and persistence analysis
Biocides (adulticides) Measures of adult mortality and population density and dynamics
Source reduction (public and private areas) Removal of mosquito breeding sites, prevention of water accumulation, avoidment of mosquito access, introduction of natural enemies (e.g., fishes, copepods) Identification of areas with high potentially removable breeding sites (e.g., landfill, ponds); estimate the reduction effort and cost and contrast them against planning Number and/or proportion of removed breeding sites out of initial estimates; presence of nets on barrel or rainwater reservoirs; absence of water in outdoor containers; presence of natural enemies inside ornamental or permanent ponds
Raising of public awareness (communication campaigns) Identification of target audience (e.g., nurseries, used tires, gardens); estimate the cost of communication campaign Assess the success of communication campaign; questionnaire post interventions (KAP studies)
Autocidal treatments (e.g., autodissemination) Estimate the number of breeding sites in private areas; environmental and health safety; estimate the treatment effort and cost Artificial breeding site sentinel; efficacy analysis and persistence; estimate the success of breeding sites reduction
Adult mass trapping Lethal ovitraps, sticky- gravid trap, BG-trap Estimate of trap coverage in target habitat; evaluate the trap management plan; estimate the cost-effectiveness Number of traps deployed, and mosquito trapped; monitoring of mosquito density and dynamics
Male-releases (e.g., Aedes albopictus) Sterile Insect Technique (SIT) Regulation; target mosquito population size and dynamics; estimate the dose of sterile males and frequency of releases; coverage (area to be treated); examine the quality profile of males planned to be released; estimate the cost-effectiveness Field induced sterility and population suppression; impact on the epidemiological risk assessment; field competitiveness indices of release males; dispersion of released males; routine quality test of released males
Wolbachia infected males (Incompatible Insect Technique, IIT)