Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Cardiol. 2021 Feb 2;146:15–21. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.01.017

Table 3:

Association of sACE2 as continuous variable (ln transformed) and echocardiographic parameters at ARIC visit 5

Echocardiographic parameter Model Beta-coefficient 95% CI p-value
Ln-LVEF 1 −0.02 −0.04, 0.002 0.08
2 −0.02 −0.04, 0.002 0.07
3 −0.004 −0.03, 0.02 0.68
Ln-LVMi 1 0.06 0.02, 0.09 0.001
2 0.05 0.01, 0.08 0.009
3 0.002 −0.03, 0.03 0.91
Ln-LAVi 1 0.08 0.03, 0.13 0.001
2 0.06 0.01, 0.11 0.011
3 0.01 −0.03, 0.05 0.73
Ln-septal e′ 1 −0.04 −0.08, −0.01 0.02
2 −0.03 −0.07, 0.01 0.10
3 −0.01 −0.04, 0.03 0.76
Ln-septal E/e′ 1 0.10 0.05, 0.15 <0.001
2 0.07 0.02, 0.12 0.01
3 0.02 −0.03, 0.07 0.47
GLS 1 0.61 0.21, 1.00 0.003
2 0.53 0.14, 0.93 0.009
3 0.16 −0.21, 0.54 0.39

Significant values in bold.

Increment in LVEF, LVMi, septal e′, septal E/e′ (log unit) and GLS (%) per log unit increase of sACE2, where sACE2 is the independent and hs-cTnI, hs-cTnT, or NT-proBNP dependent variable.

Model 1 is adjusted by age, sex, and race; model 2 is model 1 plus total cholesterol, HDL-C, current smoking, SBP, antihypertension medication use, diabetes status, lipid-lowering medication use, history of CVD (stroke, total CHD, and HF), and eGFR; model 3 is model 2 plus log hs-cTnI, log hs-cTnT, and log NT-proBNP.