Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 14;159(4):1575–1585. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.10.077

Table 4.

Multivariate Cox Regression Analyses of Functional, Hemodynamic, and Imaging Parameters: Functional, Hemodynamic, and Imaging Models Combined

Model Parameter Hazard Ratio 95% CI P Value AIC Concordance
Model 1 + 2: Functional + hemodynamic Age 1.01 0.98-1.01 .539 268 0.69
Sex 0.43 0.21-0.89 .022
6MWD 1.00 0.99-1.00 .220
RHC-RAP 1.05 0.98-1.13 .180
RHC-Svo2 0.95 0.90-1.00 .064
Model 1 + 3: Functional + imaging Age 1.01 0.99-1.04 .298 273 0.70
Sex 0.51 0.25-1.05 .069
6MWD 1.00 0.99-1.00 .045
CMR-RVEF 0.96 0.94-0.99 .004
Model 2 + 3: Hemodynamic + imaging Age 1.03 1.01-1.05 .012 320 0.71
Sex 0.49 0.26-0.95 .036
RHC-RAP 1.05 0.98-1.12 .180
RHC-Svo2 0.96 0.92-1.01 .102
CMR-RVEF 0.97 0.94-1.00 .040
Model 1 + 2 + 3: Functional + hemodynamic + imaging Age 1.02 0.99-1.04 .227 266 0.69
Sex 0.47 0.23-0.98 .044
6MWD 1.00 0.99-1.00 .220
RHC-RAP 1.02 0.95-1.10 .577
RHC-Svo2 0.98 0.92-1.04 .451
CMR-RVEF 0.97 0.94-1.00 .052

For sex, male patients are used as reference. 6MWD = 6-min walk distance; AIC = Akaike information criterion; CMR = cardiac MRI; RAP = right atrial pressure; RHC = right heart catheterization; RVEF = right ventricular ejection fraction; Svo2 = mixed venous oxygen saturation.