Table 1.
Author, Year | Study Design | Number of Patients | Clinical Improvement | Clinical Remission | Side Effects |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sandborn, 20126 | RCT | 123 vs 121 | 33.3% vs 24.8% | 17.9% vs 7.4% | 28.3% vs 26.4%§ |
BUD 9 mg vs placebo | |||||
Travis, 20147 | RCT | 109 vs 129 | 42.2% vs 33.7% | 23.9% vs 11.2% | 55.5% vs 44.2% |
17.4% vs 4.5%* | |||||
BUD 9 mg vs placebo | |||||
Rubin 20179 | RCT | 230 vs 228 | 47.0% vs 39.0%§ | 24.3% vs 22.8%§ | 31.8% vs 27.1%§ |
BUD 9 mg vs placebo | |||||
13.0% vs 7.5%* | |||||
D’Haens 201017 | Prospective multicentre study | 18 vs 18 | 47.6% vs 33.3%§# | n.a. | n.a. |
BUD 9 mg vs placebo | |||||
Danese, 201613 | Prospective multicentre observational study | 326 | 60.1% | 51.8% | 17.5% |
Maconi, 201914 | Retrospective study, multicentre study | 89 | 52.4% | 50% | 30.5% |
Fellerman, 202016 | Prospective multicentre observational study | 61 | 60.7% | 47.5% | 39.3% |
Notes: RCT, randomised clinical trial. *Clinical remission plus endoscopic remission. §Not significant. #Clinical remission at 4 weeks.
Abbreviations: n.a., not available.