Table 2. Summary of the results of the effect sizes of MSC treatment on pain relief.
First author/year | MSC | Source | Conventional meta-analysis | Network meta-analysis | Conventional meta-analysis | Network meta-analysis | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WMD (95% CI) |
Weight (%) | Subgroup analysis | WMD (95% CI) | P value | SUCRA [0-100] |
Subgroup analysis | WMD (95% CI) | P value | SUCRA [0-100] | ||||||||||
WMD (95% CI) | P value | Weight (%) |
WMD (95% CI) | P value | Weight (%) | ||||||||||||||
Vega/2015 | BM-MSCs | Allogenic | −8.00 (−27.60, 11.60) | 11.02 | −15.17 (−26.05, −4.29) | 0.006 | 35.77 | −15.17 (−26.05, −4.29) | 0.006 | 48.4 | −10.84 (−25.06, 3.38) | 0.135 | 20.92 | −10.88 (−27.01, 5.26) | 0.187 | 33.7 | |||
Gupta/2016 | −14.00 (−34.67, 6.67) | 9.90 | |||||||||||||||||
Lamo-Espinosa/2016, 2018 | Autologous | −33.15 (−55.39, −10.92) | 8.56 | −21.26 (−38.14, −4.39) | 0.014 | 14.85 | −20.91 (−39.78, −2.04) | 0.030 | 62.4 | ||||||||||
Emadedin/2018 | −5.10 (−31.03, 20.83) | 6.30 | |||||||||||||||||
Kuah/2018 | AD-MSCs | Allogenic | −21.12 (−37.49, −4.75) | 15.80 | −26.05 (−36.06, −16.04) | <0.001 | 42.20 | −26.05 (−36.06, −16.04) | <0.001 | 92.0 | −21.12 (−37.49, −4.75) | 0.014 | 15.80 | −21.12 (−40.70, −1.54) | 0.035 | 63.0 | |||
Lee/2019 | Autologous | −29.0 (−41.66, −16.34) | 26.40 | -29.0 (−41.66, −16.34) | 0.011 | 26.40 | −29.0 (−45.61, −12.39) | 0.001 | 84.8 | ||||||||||
Matas/2019 | UC-MSCs | Allogenic | −17.65 (−31.51, −3.79) | 22.03 | −17.65 (−31.51, −3.79) | 0.013 | 22.03 | −17.65 (−31.51, −3.79) | 0.013 | 59.4 | −17.65 (−31.51, −3.79) | 0.013 | 22.03 | −17.65 (−31.19, −0.11) | 0.049 | 53.1 |