Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 13;11(11):5430–5446. doi: 10.7150/thno.53961

Table 3.

Comparison of glycoengineering methods

Genetic glycoengineering Glycosyltransferase glycoengineering Chemoenzymatic glycoengineering
Strategies Modify intracellular glycosylation pathways and enzymes via genetic engineering. Extend monosaccharide residues by glycosyltransferases in vitro. Modify sugar chains by endoglycosidases and their mutants, together with chemically synthesized active glycan oxazolines.
Methods Remold sialyltransferases; increase CMP-Neu5Ac-associated enzymes or transporters; inhibit or eliminate sialidases; introduce new N-glycosylation sites. Construct one-pot system with monosaccharide precursors and glycosyltransferases. Deglycosylate IgG by an ENGase, prepare oxazoline derivatives as sugars donors via chemical methods, and transglycosylate oxazoline donor to glycoprotein.
Pros Versatility Simplicity and relatively purified products. Simplicity; relatively purified and unlimited products.
Cons Low efficiency and hybrid glyco-products Limited glyco-products; difficulty and high cost of active glycan substrates. Unavoidable hydrolytic activity of ENGase mutant; difficult to achieve oligosaccharide substrates in a large scale.

CMP, cytidine monophosphate; Neu5Ac, N-acetylneuraminic acid; ENGase, endoglycosidase.