Table 4.

Odds ratios from logistic regression models predicting suicidal ideation, Asian immigrant men (N = 770).

	Model 1	Model 2	Model 3	Model 4	Model 5
Acculturation Status (ref: Assimilated)
Integrated	.73 (.36–1.47)	.66 (.32–1.35)	.74 (.35–1.55)	.72 (.33–1.57)	.49 (.03–7.5)
Separated	2.04 (.74–5.63)	2.06 (.74–5.72)	1.75 (.73–4.21)	1.48 (.62–3.54)	1.14 (.17–7.5)
Demographic Characteristics
Age at interview	.99 (.97–1.01)	.99 (.97–1.01)	.98 (.96–1.00)	.98* (.96–1.00)	.98* (.96–1.00)
Married/Cohabiting	.38* (.16-.94)	.43 (.17–1.09)	.49 (.21–1.14)	.41* (.17-.96)	.41* (.18-.94)
Family size	.77* (.59–1.00)	.76* (.59-.98)	.75* (.58-.98)	.75* (.58-.97)	.75* (.58-.98)
Ethnic identity (ref: Chinese)
Vietnamese	.72 (.39–1.30)	.70 (.38–1.31)	.60 (.31–1.16)	.56 (.29–1.07)	.57 (.29–1.13)
Filipino	2.29* (1.03–5.09)	2.44* (1.05–5.64)	2.79* (1.14–6.80)	2.75* (1.14–6.65)	2.76* (1.13–6.78)
Other Asian	1.38 (.46–4.16)	1.25 (.43–3.62)	1.15 (.42–3.16)	1.21 (.43–3.40)	1.23 (.46–3.27)
Socioeconomic Status
Educational level		1.30 (.86–1.97)	1.31 (.84–2.05)	1.29 (.84–2.00)	1.29 (.84–2.00)
Employed		1.02 (.43–2.44)	.99 (.44–2.26)	1.00 (.46–2.19)	1.00 (.46–2.17)
Income-to-Poverty index		.94 (.88–1.01)	.95 (.89–1.01)	.96 (.90–1.02)	.96 (.90–1.02)
Stress and Support
Level of acculturative stress			1.02 (.78–1.34)	1.04 (.80–1.37)	1.05 (.81–1.36)
Level of family cultural conflict			1.22** (1.06–1.40)	1.20** (1.04–1.37)	1.20** (1.05–1.38)
Frequent attendance at religious services			1.02 (.36–2.90)	1.09 (.37–3.21)	1.09 (.38–3.18)
Received support from family/relatives		.86 (.69-1.07)		.92 (.74–1.16)	.92 (.72–1.18)
Perceived support from family/relatives		.83* (.71-.98)		.85* (.72–1.01)	.86* (.72–1.01)
Received support from friends				.75 (.54–1.04)	.76 (.53–1.07)
Perceived support from friends				.98 (.82–1.17)	.93 (.65–1.34)
Perceived Support from Friends$\times$Acculturation Status
Integrated					1.07 (.69–1.67)
Separated					1.05 (.76–1.44)

NOTE: 95% confidence intervals in parentheses. *p$\le$.05 **p$\le$.01 ***p$\le$.001.