Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 26;22(1-2):167–178. doi: 10.1080/26895269.2020.1848693

Table 2.

Dataset coding for all participants (n = 3667).

Gamete storage decision Under 18
(n = 360)
18-45
(n = 2722)
Over 45
(n = 585)
  Patients n (%) Patients n (%) Patients n (%)
Gametes stored 17 (4.7) 147 (5.4) 4 (0.7)
Patients who wanted to store gametes but were unable to
Delay in treatmenta 46 (12.8) 245 (9.0) 16 (2.7)
Expense 11 (3.1) 255 (9.4) 2 (0.3)
Invasive 6 (1.7) 12 (0.4) 1 (0.2)
Locally unavailable 2 (0.6) 62 (2.3) 20 (3.4)
Patients who did not want to store gametes
Does not want children 131 (36.4) 1209 (44.4) 218 (37.3)
Geneticsb 4 (1.1) 43 (1.6) 2 (0.3)
Adoption 64 (17.8) 414 (15.2) 1 (0.2)
Family complete 0 (0.0) 133 (4.9) 149 (25.5)
Gender dysphoria 33 (9.2) 139 (5.1) 8 (1.4)
Infertile 0 (0.0) 37 (1.4) 49 (8.4)
Olderc 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 113 (19.3)
Outcome unknown
Wanted storage, outcome unknown 32 (8.9) 20 (0.7) 0 (0.0)
Unknown 14 (3.9) 6 (0.2) 2 (0.3)

Note. Complete results from all patients showing all recorded gamete storage decisions across 3 age groups.

a

Treatment refers to hormone treatment – either testosterone or estrogen and progesterone. These patients wanted to store gametes but did not wish to delay starting their hormone treatment to achieve this.

b

This refers to those patients who did not wish to pass their genetics on to any future children.

c

These patients considered themselves either too old to start a family or were too old to be able to store viable gametes.