Skip to main content
. 2021 May;103(5):291–304. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.01.017

Table 3.

Safety of systemic hormonal contraception initiated after surgical abortion

Author, year, location, funding Study design, follow-up, study quality* Population Intervention Comparison Outcome & results Strengths Weaknesses
Steinauer, 2014 [23]
United States
Anonymous
donor
RCT
Phone f/u at 2 and 6 months
Poor quality
Women who had a surgical abortion (1st and 2nd trimester)
Median weeks GA at time of abortion:
Immediate: 15.9 wks
delayed: 15.6 wks (n = 298, n = 212 analyzed at 2 month)
Immediate
contraceptive patch:
observed initiation in clinic after abortion (n = 154, n = 108 analyzed at 2 month)
Delayed
contraceptive patch:
initiated on first Sunday after abortion (n = 144, n = 104 analyzed at 2 month)
Bleeding
Pattern Changes
Days of bleeding requiring a pad, self-reported at 2 months
Median days of bleeding:
Immediate: 5
Delayed: 5p = 
0.94
Adequate randomization and allocation concealment
Blinded outcome assessment by research assistant conducting follow-up
Acceptable attrition (immediate: 29.9%, delayed: 27.8%)
Power calculation rates based on continuation rates
Self-reported outcome with potential for recall bias
High attrition (29%) at 2 months and at 6 months (47%)
Delayed group may have varying times to Sunday start, potentially affecting bleeding outcome
Hou, 2017 [30]
China
Shanghai
Population
and Family
Planning
Commission
Of PR China
Prospective cohort
Phone f/u at 1, 3, and 6 months
Poor quality
Women who had a vacuum aspiration at 42-70 days GA (n = 705)
COC (EE/ desogestrel):
initiated immediately after abortion (n = 230)
Non-hormonal:
initiated
immediately after abortion
Cu-IUD (n = 240)
Condoms
Bleeding
Pattern Changes
Bleeding days after abortion (median, range):
COC: 5 (2-7)
Cu-IUD: 7 (3-10)
Condom: 5.5 (3-8)p = 
0.041
Outcomes clearly defined Day of COC initiation was not detailed nor confirmed
Non-comparable groups (COC users were younger and had a higher education level; IUD users were older)
Self-report of bleeding duration
Wang, 2017 [29]
China
Source of
funding NR
Prospective cohort
Clinic f/u on day 21 following abortion
Poor quality
Women who had a surgical abortion,
GA was not clearly stated
(n = 726)
COC (30µg EE/3 mg
drosperinone):
initiated immediately after abortion x 21 days
(n = 312)
Non-hormonal:
no COC x 21 days after abortion, recommended condom use
(n = 414)
Bleeding Pattern
Changes
Bleeding days after abortion (%):
<7 days
COC: 286/312=91.7%
No COC: 294/414=71.0% p < 0.01
>15 days
COC: 4/312=1.3%
No COC: 27/414=6.5% p < 0.01
Bleeding volume more than menses (%):
COC: 13/312=4.2%
No COC: 24/414=5.8% p < 0.01
No loss to follow-up GA not specified
Day of COC initiation not specified
Ortayli, 2001 [21]
Turkey
Population
Council
Nobel Co.
Prospective cohort
Clinic f/u at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 6 and 12 months (Hct at 6 weeks, 6 and 12 months)
Menstrual diaries collected at 2 and 6 weeks
Poor quality
Women who had a surgical abortion at ≤ 10 weeks GA by vacuum or electric aspiration
(n = 150)
Mean GA age
Implant: 54.2 days
Nonhormonal: 49.4 days
LNG implant:
inserted immediately after abortion
(n = 50)
Non-hormonal/none:
withdrawal method or no method (n = 50)
Bleeding Pattern Changes
Hct change from baseline to 6 weeks (mean, SD):
Implant: 1.0 ± 3.8
No hormonal/none: 1.7 ± 4.3p = 
NS
Bleeding days, 2 weeks (mean, SD):
Implant: 5.0 ± 3.2
No hormonal/none: 6.2 ± 4.6p <
0.05
Bleeding days, 6 weeks (mean, SD):
Implant: 6.3 ± 5.7
No hormonal/none: 5.7 ± 6.7p = 
NS
Groups similar at baseline by education, pregnancy and abortion history, and use of recent contraception, experience with IUDs or condoms, and BP, Hct and GA
Long follow up time
Well defined outcomes
Groups differed by age, time since last pregnancy and experience with OCs, and weight
Attrition not reported
Some women switched methods during follow-up period
No power calculations
Querido, 1985 [18]
Netherlands
Organon
Schering
Multi-site prospective cohort
Clinic f/u at 6 weeks
Poor quality
Women who had a surgical abortion,
GA was not clearly stated
(n = 423)
OC:
initiated after abortion, unclear timing (n = 123)
Non-hormonal:
Cu-IUD inserted immediately after abortion (n = 300)
Bleeding Pattern Changes
Bleeding days after abortion (%):
1-7 days of bleeding:
OC: 56.6%
Cu-IUD: 29.7%
>14 days of bleeding:
OC: 9.8%
Cu-IUD: 19.9% p < 0.0001
OC group was overrepresented with younger, unmarried, nullip, without prior abortion OC type not specified
OC initiation not detailed
Groups differed demographically
Range of follow-up times (range of less to more than 6 weeks)
Unclear randomization of OC group
Kurunmaki, 1983 [17]
Finland
International Development Research Center of Canada, Ford Foundation, Rockefeller Foundation
Prospective cohort
Clinic f/u at 3, 6, 12 months (measured Hgb, BP, weight; daily bleeding records)
Poor quality
Women who had at surgical abortion in the first trimester
(n = 68)
LNG implant: inserted immediately after abortion (n = 38 assigned, n = 36 inserted)
Non-hormonal: Cu-IUD inserted immediately after abortion (n = 30 assigned, n = 23 inserted) Bleeding Pattern Changes
Bleeding days after abortion (mean, SD):
Implant: 15.1 ± 6.9
Cu-IUD: 14.3 ± 6.9p = 
NS
Measured bleeding by both objective and subjective measures
Outcomes clearly defined
Small study size with no power calculations
Assignment of contraception type not described
Groups only described and compared by assignment not insertions at baseline
Attrition not reported
No confounding assessment
Peterson, 1974 [16]
United States
Wyeth Labs
Prospective cohort
Clinic f/u at 6 weeks or form filled out by non-study physician at 6 weeks and mailed to clinic
Poor quality
Women who had a surgical abortion,
GA was not clearly stated
(n = 978, n = 823 analyzed)
COC:
initiated on day of abortion (n = 479 analyzed)
Non-hormonal/none:
diaphragms, condoms, no method (n = 198 analyzed)
Bleeding Pattern Changes
Self-reported at clinic visit or by form at 6 weeks
Stopped bleeding by day 7 (%):
COC: 58%
Control: 59%
Stopped bleeding by day 14 (%):
COC: 86%
Control: 90%
Stopped bleeding by day 21 (%):
COC: 94%
Control: 96%
Stopped bleeding by day 28 (%):
COC: 97%
Control: 98%

No significance testing at any time points
Two control groups using non-hormonal contraceptives
Acceptable attrition (overall 15.8%)
Groups not assessed at baseline or by outcome for potential confounders
Outcome ascertainment not described
No significance testing to detect outcome differences
Unclear what GA included in study
Only outcome is a self-reported outcome with potential for recall bias

BP, blood pressure; COC, combined oral contraception; Cu, copper; EE, ethinyl estradiol; F/U, follow-up; GA, gestational age; Hct, hematocrit; Hgb, hemoglobin; IUD, intrauterine device; LNG, levonorgestrel; LTFU, lost to follow up; NR, not reported; NS, not significant; OC, oral contraception; RCT, randomized controlled trial.

*Quality rating based on the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) grading criteria [12,13].