Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Apr 12.
Published in final edited form as: J Pers Disord. 2016 Apr 18;31(1):133–144. doi: 10.1521/pedi_2016_30_242

Table 2.

Husbands’ and Wives’ Impulsivity and Husbands’ Marital Trajectories

Intercept
Linear Slope
Estimate (SE) t ratio Effect size r Estimate (SE) t ratio Effect size r
Marital satisfaction
 Main effect 94.24 (0.76) −0.72 (0.16) −4.45** 0.32
 Husband impulsivity −0.19 (0.10) −1.96* 0.15 0.00 (0.02) 0.10 0.01
 Wife impulsivity −0.01 (0.13) −0.05 0.00 −0.03 (0.04) −0.78 0.06
Marital problems
 Main effect 49.95 (1.55) 0.50 (0.27) 1.86 0.14
 Husband impulsivity 0.49 (0.22) 2.28* 0.17 0.03 (0.04) 0.79 0.06
 Wife impulsivity 0.31 (0.28) 1.11 0.09 −0.03 (0.06) −0.58 0.04
Relationship commitment
 Main effect 74.33 (0.54) −0.19 (0.10) −1.87 0.14
 Husband impulsivity −0.12 (0.07) −1.71 0.13 0.00 (0.02) −0.26 0.02
 Wife impulsivity −0.14 (0.10) −1.41 0.11 −0.01 (0.02) −0.48 0.04
Verbal aggression
 Main effect 3.51 (0.21) −0.10 (0.07) −1.31 0.10
 Husband impulsivity 0.03 (0.03) 0.90 0.07 0.01 (0.01) 0.77 0.06
 Wife impulsivity 0.02 (0.04) 0.61 0.05 0.01 (0.01) 0.46 0.04

Notes. Intercepts were significant p < .01 because the lowest possible score was greater than zero, so these statistics are not reported.

Husbands’ and wives’ impulsivity scores were grand-mean centered within sex. N = 172 couples. df = 169 for all analyses. Effect size r = sqrt [t2/(t2 + df)].

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.