Table 2.
Subcohort | Cu | Fe | K | Ni | S | Si | V | Zn |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Averagea | 0.81 | 0.84 | 0.22 | 0.33 | 0.59 | 0.56 | 0.27 | 0.60 |
CEANS-SDPP | 0.27 | 0.72 | 0.16 | 0.24 | 0.48 | 0.16 | 0.27 | |
CEANS-SIXTY | 0.86 | 0.89 | 0.44 | 0.39 | 0.76 | 0.45 | ||
CEANS-SALT | 0.88 | 0.91 | 0.47 | 0.38 | 0.81 | 0.44 | ||
CEANS-SNACK | 0.86 | 0.90 | 0.49 | 0.47 | 0.79 | 0.70 | 0.39 | 0.53 |
DCH | 0.94 | 0.89 | 0.69 | 0.78 | 0.53 | 0.58 | 0.61 | |
DNC-1993 | 0.80 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 0.45 | 0.72 | 0.43 | 0.35 | 0.63 |
DNC-1999 | 0.77 | 0.78 | 0.35 | 0.43 | 0.70 | 0.41 | 0.34 | 0.63 |
EPIC-NL-MORGEN | 0.92 | 0.93 | 0.82 | 0.89 | 0.20 | 0.59 | 0.7 | 0.52 |
EPIC-NL-Prospect | 0.94 | 0.94 | 0.11 | 0.09 | 0.58 | 0.82 | 0.71 | |
HNR | 0.81 | 0.70 | 0.53 | 0.56 | 0.72 | 0.53 | 0.79 | |
E3N | 0.90 | 0.89 | 0.62 | 0.51 | 0.67 | 0.55 | 0.72 | 0.83 |
KORA-S3 | 0.71 | 0.84 | 0.23 | 0.62 | 0.79 | 0.55 | ||
KORA-S4 | 0.77 | 0.85 | 0.10 | 0.59 | 0.85 | 0.22 | 0.67 | |
VHM&PP | 0.88 | 0.74 | 0.89 | 0.79 | 0.22 | 0.74 |
Note: CEANS, Cardiovascular Effects of Air Pollution and Noise in Stockholm; Cu, copper; DCH, Diet, Cancer and Health cohort; DNC, Danish Nurse Cohort (1993 and 1999); EPIC-NL, European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition–Netherlands cohort; E3N, Etude Epidémiologique auprès de femmes de la Mutuelle Générale de l’Education Nationale; Fe, iron; HNR, Heinz Nixdorf Recall study; K, potassium; KORA, the Cooperative Health Research in the Region of Augsburg [1994–1995 (S3) and 1999–2001 (S4)], MORGEN, Monitoring Project on Risk Factors and Chronic Diseases in the Netherlands; Ni, nickel; , fine particulate matter; S, sulfur; SALT, Stockholm Screening Across the Lifespan Twin study; SDPP, Stockholm Diabetes Prevention Program; Si, silicon; SIXTY, Stockholm Cohort of 60-Year-Olds; SNACK, Swedish National Study on Aging and Care in Kungsholmen; V, vanadium; VHM&PP, Vorarlberg Health Monitoring and Prevention Program; Zn, zinc.
Average of cohort-specific correlation coefficients. Cohort-specific correlations are shown because the analyses mostly exploit within-cohort exposure contrasts (i.e., stratified by subcohort identification).