Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Appl Radiat Isot. 2021 Feb 10;171:109638. doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2021.109638

Table 2:

Monte Carlo Comparison: Simulated Measurement Apparatus vs Electronic Equilibrium Simulations

18 MV
30 nm GNP diameter
Mass% Gold Monte Carlo DEF – Experimental Geometry Monte Carlo DEF – Electronic Equilibrium Percent Difference between means
1.3 1.0215 ± 0.0013 1.0203 ± 0.0004 0.12%
1 1.0094 ± 0.0009 1.0095 ± 0.0004 0.009%
100 nm GNP diameter
Mass% Gold Monte Carlo DEF – Experimental Geometry Monte Carlo DEF – Electronic Equilibrium Percent Difference between means
1 1.0104 ± 0.0008 1.0111 ± 0.0004 0.07%
6 MV
30 nm GNP diameter
Mass% Gold Monte Carlo DEF – Experimental Geometry Monte Carlo DEF – Electronic Equilibrium Percent Difference between means
1.3 1.0001 ± 0.0022 1.0004 ± 0.0019 0.03%