Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 10;8:109719–109731. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3001298

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3.

Parameter sensitivity. The four surfaces explore the expected total number of infections (population Inline graphic) for various parameter values Inline graphic and Inline graphic (for Inline graphic) and different control strategies (i.e. Inline graphic for different Inline graphic). The four surfaces depicted here correspond to (a) Inline graphic; (b) Inline graphic; (c) Inline graphic; (d) Inline graphic (that is, 99%, 90%, 80% and 70% observance of physical distancing measures). The three coordinates are (x) Inline graphic; (y) Inline graphic; and (z) Inline graphic (the logarithm base-10 of the total number of infections). In each case we computed 80 simulations of 300 days. Other parameters are as reported in Table 1. Surface (a) and (b) exhibit linear scaling with changing parameter values Inline graphic and Inline graphic, while for (c) and (d) that growth is exponential. That is, when compliance with isolation measures drops below 90% there is an explosive growth in the level of infection with Inline graphic and Inline graphic.