Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 11;15:1204. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2021.1204

Table 3. Univariate analysis for EFS and OS in advanced disease (stages II and III, n = 68).

EFS OS
Variables Number HR 95% CI p HR 95% CI p
Site of primary Testicular (n = 60) 1 0.94 1 0.59
Retroperitoneum (n = 8) 2.03 0.46–8.94 1.74 0.22–13.45
Age ≤28 years (n = 35) 1 0.06 1 0.07
>28 years (n = 33) 0.39 0.15–1.03 0.35 0.11–1.09
Symptom durationa ≤4 months (n = 27) 1 0.63 1 0.7
>4 months (n = 24) 0.76 0.25–2.28 1.25 0.38–4.13
Testicular violation No (n = 49) 1 0.39 1 0.02
Yes (n = 11) 1.66 0.57–5.21 4.24 1.26–14.27
Type of orchiectomyb High inguinal (n = 50) 1 0.24 1 0.32
Scrotal (n = 9) 1.96 0.64–6.02 1.92 0.53–6.98
Stage of disease Stage II (n = 19) 1 0.19 1 0.21
Stage III (n = 49) 2.26 0.66–7.34 2.59 0.58–11.55
IGCCCG risk groupc Good (n = 29) 1 1
Intermediate (n = 13) 3.09 0.98–9.75 0.06 1.83 0.45–7.39 0.4
Poor (n = 21) 2.64 0.83–8.36 0.1 2.87 0.81–10.3 0.1
S3 marker (n = 60) No (n = 49) 1 0.18 1 0.04
Yes (n = 11) 2.20 0.70–6.92 3.74 1.07–13.04
Non-pulmonary visceral mets Absent (n = 55) 1 0.09 1 0.08
Present (n = 13) 2.32 0.89–6.07 2.59 0.88–7.64
Chemotherapy typed BEP (n = 43) 1 0.07 1 0.07
EP (n = 21) 0.32 0.09–1.08 0.15 0.02–1.28
a

Symptom duration not recorded in 17 patients

b

One patient did not undergo orchiectomy

c

Risk stratification not available in five patients

d

Two patients received VIP based chemotherapy and another two patients underwent RPLND

BEP, Bleomycin/etoposide/cisplatin; CI, Confidence interval; EFS, Event free survival; EP, Etoposide/cisplatin; HR, Hazard ratio, IGCCCG, International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group; OS, Overall survival