Table 2. Distribution of pattern of tamul consumption by product type and socio-demographic characteristics of the survey participants (N = 479).
| Variable | Type of chewer (N = 479) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tamul only | Betel quid with tamul | Betel quid with tamul and tobacco | Gutka | All | ||||||
| n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | |
| Age | ||||||||||
| 18–30 | 32 | 23 | 40 | 28 | 21 | 15 | 24 | 17 | 25 | 18 |
| 31–40 | 28 | 17 | 61 | 37 | 24 | 15 | 21 | 13 | 30 | 18 |
| 41–50 | 22 | 23 | 32 | 33 | 16 | 17 | 6 | 6 | 20 | 21 |
| ≥51 | 22 | 29 | 30 | 39 | 10 | 13 | 2 | 3 | 13 | 17 |
| Gender | ||||||||||
| Female | 21 | 15 | 60 | 43 | 14 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 41 | 20 |
| Male | 83 | 24 | 103 | 30 | 57 | 17 | 51 | 15 | 47 | 14 |
| Marital status | ||||||||||
| Married | 74 | 22 | 123 | 36 | 52 | 15 | 28 | 8 | 64 | 19 |
| Single | 30 | 22 | 40 | 29 | 19 | 14 | 25 | 18 | 24 | 17 |
| Occupation | ||||||||||
| Students | 14 | 21 | 15 | 23 | 12 | 18 | 9 | 14 | 16 | 24 |
| Home maker | 2 | 13 | 11 | 69 | 3 | 18.8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Professional | 11 | 20 | 20 | 37 | 7 | 13 | 1 | 2 | 15 | 28 |
| Tamul seller | 14 | 17 | 15 | 18 | 27 | 33 | 18 | 22 | 9 | 11 |
| Self employed | 38 | 25 | 53 | 35 | 15 | 9.9 | 17 | 11 | 29 | 19 |
| Daily wage labourer | 25 | 23 | 49 | 45 | 7 | 6.5 | 8 | 7 | 19 | 18 |