Figure - PMC

Skip to main content

An official website of the United States government

Here's how you know

Here's how you know

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

View full-text article in PMC

. 2021 Apr 13;10:e58791. doi: 10.7554/eLife.58791

Search in PMC
Search in PubMed
View in NLM Catalog
Add to search

© 2021, Hoermann et al

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

PMC Copyright notice

Figure 4. — Fecundity of single females of the homozygous strains Sco^GFP-CP, ScoG^CFP-AP2, and Aper1-Sco^GFP(A) and the markerless strains Sco-CP, ScoG-AP2, and Aper1-Sco (B) compared to the G3 wild-type and the vasa-Cre strain (KIL background) used to remove the marker module. All data sets have a Gaussian distribution according to the Shapiro–Wilk test, except of Sco^GFP-CP. p-values were calculated using the unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test. Larval hatch rates of the transgenic strains with (C) and without (D) the marker, as well as the control strains, from the eggs above. None of the data sets showed a Gaussian distribution according to Shapiro–Wilk, and the p-values were calculated using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Data from three biological replicates were pooled and the total number analysed is indicated on top. Mean with standard error (SEM) were plotted. *p≤0.05, **p≤0.01, ***p≤0.001, ****p≤0.0001, and ns: not significant.

Figure 4—figure supplement 1. — Fecundity of single females of the homozygous strains Sco^GFP-CP, ScoG^CFP-AP2, and Aper1-Sco^GFP(A) and the markerless strains Sco-CP, ScoG-AP2, and Aper1-Sco (B) compared to the G3 wild-type and the vasa-Cre strain (KIL background) used to remove the marker module. All data sets have a Gaussian distribution according to the Shapiro–Wilk test, except of Sco^GFP-CP. p-values were calculated using the unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test. Larval hatch rates of the transgenic strains with (C) and without (D) the marker, as well as the control strains, from the eggs above. None of the data sets showed a Gaussian distribution according to Shapiro–Wilk, and the p-values were calculated using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Data from three biological replicates were pooled and the total number analysed is indicated on top. Mean with standard error (SEM) were plotted. *p≤0.05, **p≤0.01, ***p≤0.001, ****p≤0.0001, and ns: not significant.