Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 15;31(5):2768–2777. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07289-4

Table 1.

Demographic and clinical characteristics in all cohorts of LVH as well as in controls. P values indicate results from ANOVA analyses between groups of LVH

LVH Controls
HOCM HNCM AH p value HOCM controls HNCM controls AH controls
Demographics N = 33 N = 9 N = 13 N = 33 N = 9 N = 13
Male, n (%) 13 (39) 7 (78) 13 (100) < 0.001 13(39) 7 (78) 13 (100)
Age (years) 60.5 ± 17.9 47.1 ± 8.3 35.3 ± 12.2 < 0.001 66.8 ± 14.8 46.8 ± 8.0 32.3 ± 11.5
BMI (kg/m2) 28.0 ± 6.1 27.6 ± 4.8 29.6 ± 3.8 0.231 24.1 ± 3.0* 23.7 ± 3.0 22.1 ± 3.5#
Clinical
Diabetes, n (%) 2 (6) 1 (11) 0 (0) 0.530 3 (9) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Manifest hypertension, n (%) 25 (78) 0 (0) 0 (0) < 0.001 22 (67) 4 (44) 1 (8)
Hypercholesterolemia, n (%) 17 (53) 2 (22) 0 (0) 0.001 12 (36) 2 (22) 0 (0)
CKD III, n (%) 9 (28) 2 (22) 0 (0) 0.068 5 (15) 1 (11) 0 (0)
CAD, n (%) 7 (2) 1 (11) 0 (0) 0.200 6 (18) 1 (11) 0 (0)
PCI, n (%) 3 (9) 1 (11) 0 (0) 0.611 3 (9) 1 (11) 0 (0)
Class NYHA III–IV, n (%) 15 (45) 1 (11) 0 (0) 0.003 1 (3)* 0 (0) 0 (0)
MR > I°, n (%) 12 (36) 1 (11) 0 (0) 0.013 9 (27) 1 (11) 0 (0)

ANOVA, analysis of variance; AH, athlete’s heart; BMI, body mass index; CAD, coronary artery disease; CKD III, chronic kidney disease (glomerular filtration rate < 60 ml/min); HNCM, hypertrophic non-obstructive cardiomyopathy; HOCM, hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy; MR, mitral regurgitation; NYHA, New York Heart Association classification; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention. */#< 0.05/0.01 in comparison with the corresponding LVH group