Table 1.
WMS stages | WMS in EF | WMS in ToM | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age | Referent | What can be described | Example: “whale” | |||
Syncretic concepts | From 1 year old | Relation to referent is not fixed in any way, the referent can change depending on the context. | Aspects of the world can be labeled. | “Whale” may refer to a whale, one of its properties (e.g., a whale cry) or its context (the sea). | Labeling stimuli and representing them in working memory in the absence of their referent. | Verbally labeling emotions in the body, and facial expressions in others. |
Object concepts | From 1.5 years old | Objects and object-specific properties. Objects are usually defined by their shape. | Properties can be verbally attributed to objects. | “Whale” refers to the shape of a whale. | Specific labeling and representation of (absent) objects and their properties. | Attributing emotions to specific agents. |
Everyday concepts | From 3 years old | Objects, object-specific properties, and relations between objects (i.e., situations). | All aspects of the sensory world, as well as non-sensory aspects and fantasy worlds (understood in concrete, everyday terms). | “Whales are big and they swim in the sea.” | Representing verbal plans consisting of several consecutive steps that span into the far future. | Perspective taking; passing false belief tasks; attributing cognitive states, understood in a concrete, everyday manner. |
Logical concepts | From 7 years old | Sharp linguistically defined categories based on necessary and sufficient attributes, or other (subordinate) words. | Coherent and logical understanding of the sensory and non-sensory world. | “A ‘whale’ is a mammal, because female whales have mammary glands.” | Creating precise and coherent verbal plans based on an accurate understanding of the non-sensory world | Coherent and potentially accurate understanding of mental states and underlying processes. |
Systemic concepts | From 12 years old (if ever) | Sharp linguistically defined categories that are defined explicitly in relation to each other, but one object may belong to multiple categories depending on the context. | Valid understanding of sensory and non-sensory world whereby premises of conclusions are consciously selected and justified. | It is understood that a whale can be categorized as either a mammal or a fish, depending on the definition. | Greater ability to contextualize plans to specific circumstances in the context of larger goals | Understanding mental states in the context of the mind as a whole system. |
Word meaning development lays the basis for the corresponding EF and ToM development, but the latter may need more time to develop. The mammal example is based on Toomela (2003).