Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Apr 12.

Published in final edited form as: Curr Biol. 2021 Feb 4;31(7):1428–1437.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.01.027

Table 2.

Reinstatement by ROI and stimulation condition

Region	Mean z score (SE)			p value
	Control	HNT	HNT - control	Control	HNT	HNT vs. control
L fusiform gyrus	0.74 (.21)	0.57 (.24)	−0.17 (.29)	0.003^a	0.032^a	0.628
R middle occipital gyrus	0.95 (.29)	1.04 (.25)	0.09 (.35)	0.004^a	<0.001^a	0.810
R angular gyrus	0.91 (.33)	0.88 (.27)	−0.03 (.39)	0.012^a	0.004^a	0.925
L middle temporal gyrus	0.70 (.27)	0.64 (.27)	−0.07 (.32)	0.017^a	0.031^a	0.754
R middle temporal gyrus	0.85 (.32)	0.84 (.31)	−0.01 (.40)	0.015^a	0.013^a	0.884
L middle occipital gyrus	0.28 (.31)	1.45 (.24)	1.18 (.31)	0.388	<0.001^a	0.002^a
R precuneus	0.38 (.27)	0.70 (16)	0.32 (.30)	0.183	<0.001^a	0.300
L precuneus	0.23 (.25)	0.60 (.21)	0.36 (.35)	0.362	0.010^a	0.318
R fusiform gyrus	0.55 (.27)	0.63 (.29)	0.08 (.35)	0.054	0.042	0.828
L angular gyrus	0.41 (.23)	0.64 (.31)	0.23 (.37)	0.096	0.054	0.546

^a

reported p-value passed Benjamini-Hochberg correction for multiple comparisons

Bolded mean values are significant as measured by one-sample t-tests

Difference z-score reflects the average of within-subject differences between HNT - control