Table 1.

Inter-expert agreement: Likert-scale evaluations of the pertinence of the orientations and in the responses to questions two, three, four, and five.

	Analysis	Coefficient	Standard error	95% CI
Analyses using the five-point Likert scale
Pertinence of the orientation	Percent agreement	0.85	0.01	0.82–0.88
	Scott/Fleiss Kappa	0.69	0.03	0.62–0.75
Pertinence of the orientation based on clinical features	Percent agreement	0.31	0.05	0.20–0.42
	Scott/Fleiss Kappa	0.07	0.06	−0.06–0.21
Pertinence of the orientation based on the coherence of care	Percent agreement	0.39	0.06	0.24–0.53
	Scott/Fleiss Kappa	0.18	0.06	0.03–0.33
Pertinence of the orientation based on sociodemographic characteristics	Percent agreement	0.38	0.07	0.25–0.51
	Scott/Fleiss Kappa	0.17	0.06	0.03–0.31
Pertinence of the orientation based on the reactivity and proactivity of the care	Percent agreement	0.35	0.05	0.23–0.46
	Scott/Fleiss Kappa	0.17	0.05	0.05–0.29
Analyses using the three grouped categories (1 or 2, 3 and 4, or 5)
Pertinence of the orientation based on clinical features	Percent agreement	0.57	0.05	0.46–0.69
	Scott/Fleiss Kappa	0.14	0.08	−0.03–0.32
Pertinence of the orientation based on the coherence of care	Percent agreement	0.63	0.06	0.50–0.77
	Scott/Fleiss Kappa	0.30	0.10	0.07–0.53
Pertinence of the orientation based on sociodemographic characteristics	Percent agreement	0.62	0.08	0.45–0.79
	Scott/Fleiss Kappa	0.30	0.11	0.06–0.54
Pertinence of the orientation based on the reactivity and proactivity of the care	Percent agreement	0.53	0.06	0.39–0.67
	Scott/Fleiss Kappa	0.27	0.08	0.08–0.53