Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 29;58(5):587–596. doi: 10.1177/1055665620959989

Table 4.

Association Between Exposure Variables and the Average Point Score (APS) Assessed Using Linear Regression Coefficients, 95% Confidence Intervals, and P Values.a

Variable Category Model 1 (month of birth & gender) Model 2 (month of birth, gender, SES)
N Coef 95% CI P N Coef 95% CI P
Dentoalveolar (vs excellent/good) Fair 159 −0.17 −1.34 to 0.99 .8 158 −0.16 −1.30 to 0.97 >.9
Poor/Very poor −0.18 −1.57 to 1.20 0.03 −1.31 to 1.37
Nasolabial appearance (vs excellent/good) Fair 193 0.04 −0.99 to 1.07 .2 192 −0.04 −1.02 to 0.94 .2
Poor/Very poor −1.78 −3.48 to −0.08 −1.64 −3.31 to 0.03
Decayed missing filled teeth (Dmft) (vs 0) 1-3 203 −1.02 −2.09 to 0.05 .001 200 −0.70 −1.74 to 0.34 .02
4+ −1.89 −3.08 to −0.71 −1.40 −2.59 to −0.20
Audiology (best ear) (vs normal hearing) Any hearing loss 164 −1.01 −2.33 to 0.31 .1 162 −0.90 −2.16 to −0.35 .2
Intelligibility (vs normal) Different but intelligible 184 −0.45 −1.54 to 0.64 <.001 182 −0.40 −1.45 to 0.65 .001
Just intelligible or less −2.97 −4.29 to −1.65 −2.44 −3.72 to −1.16
Psychological Low self-confidence Yes 185 −1.99 −3.80 to −1.72 .03 182 −1.60 −3.36 to 0.16 .08
Child is bullied Yes 189 0.09 −1.71 to 1.88 .9 186 0.05 −1.73 to 1.83 >.9
Minimum number of problems (vs 0-1) 2 205 −0.70 −1.70 to 0.29 <.001 202 −0.49 −1.45 to 0.47 .002
3-6 −2.67 −3.96 to −1.38 −2.26 −3.55 to −0.97

Abbreviations: Coef., coefficient; SES, socioeconomic status.

a Two statistical models were used, with model 1 adjusting for month of birth and gender and model 2 adjusting for month of birth, gender, and an area-based measure of socioeconomic status (SES).