Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 22;12:640186. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.640186

TABLE 5.

The table shows the results of the robot rating for both robots in comparison between the condition groups for each interaction (see also section “Robot Rating: Robots were evaluated different in condition groups”).

Pepper
Panda
Time point Factors Upper bound Lower bound Effect size p-value Upper bound Lower bound Effect size p-value
First interaction Easy to use –3.03 –0.74 0.703 0.003 –2.48 –0.31 0.712 0.018
Correction of errors –3.49 –0.95 0.726 0.002
Easy to brief –2.86 –0.36 0.622 0.016
Good task –2.87 –0.13 0.636 0.036
Pleasant use –2.19 –0.028 0.524 0.045
productivity –2.34 –0.41 0.649 0.009
Clarity of reactions –2.97 –0.28 0.611 0.022
Second interaction Easy to use –3.67 –1.66 0.863 0.000099
Good task –2.14 –0.18 0.583 0.024 –3.31 –0.57 0.684 0.010
Pleasant use –2.02 –0.63 0.755 0.001 –3.38 –0.74 0.738 0.006
Productivity –2.43 –0.21 0.652 0.025 –4.03 –0.63 0.718 0.013
Satisfaction –2.46 –0.04 0.527 0.044 –3.49 –0.39 0.749 0.021
Clarity of reaction –2.94 –0.16 0.557 0.031
Easy to brief –2.24 –0.04 0.529 0.043 –3.01 –1.10 0.802 0.000499
learning to use –2.87 –0.47 0.687 0.011
Overall evaluation –4.32 –0.24 0.729 0.034