Table 4.
Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) evidence profile: certainty of evidence for the primary objective.
| Outcome | Studies, n | Quality of evidence factors | Direction of effect SOFa | Quality of evidenceb | |||||||
|
|
|
Limitation | Heterogeneity | Indirectness | Imprecision | Publication bias | TTc, n | MTTd, n | Directione |
|
|
| Effectiveness | |||||||||||
|
|
Model | 11 |
Serious | Serious | Serious | Serious | Unlikely | 3 | 8 | ↑ | Very low |
|
|
Cross-sectional study | 1 |
Not serious | Unlikely | Serious | Serious | Unlikely | 0 | 1 | ↑ | Very low |
| Cost-effectiveness | |||||||||||
|
|
Model | 1 | Serious | Unlikely | Serious | Serious | Unlikely | 0 | 1 | ↑ | Very low |
aSOF: summary of findings.
bQuality of evidence graded as either “very low,” “low,” “moderate,” or “high.”
cTT: test and trace.
dMTT: mass testing and contact tracing.
e↑MTT is better than TT; ↓TT is better than MTT; ↔ MTT and TT are equivocal.