Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 13;21:69. doi: 10.1186/s12880-021-00599-z

Table 2.

Comparison matrix for p values of systematic differences in validation detection rates between lymph node levels

p VALUES 1L 1R 2L 2R 3A 3P 4L 4R 5 6 7 8 9 10L 10R 11L 11R
1L 0.29 0.02 < 0.001 0.08 0.4 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 0.96 0.32 0.02 < 0.001 0.02 0.04
1R 0.29 0.34 < 0.001 0.75 0.76 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 0.21 0.92 0.17 < 0.001 0.11 0.15
2L 0.02 0.34 < 0.001 0.28 0.14 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 0.5 0.45 < 0.001 0.26 0.32
2R < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 0.83 0.01 0.75 0.97 0.08 < 0.001 0.01 0.16 0.5 0.57 0.69
3A 0.08 0.75 0.28 < 0.001 0.42 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 0.01 0.9 0.15 < 0.001 0.11 0.17
3P 0.4 0.76 0.14 < 0.001 0.42 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 0 0.29 0.72 0.08 < 0.001 0.06 0.1
4L < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 0.83 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 0.9 0.89 0.1 < 0.001 0.01 0.12 0.59 0.51 0.64
4R < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 0.01 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 0.01 0.02 0.51 < 0.001 < 0.001 0.01 0.12 0.12 0.22
5 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 0.75 < 0.001 < 0.001 0.9 0.01 0.81 0.13 < 0.001 0.01 0.11 0.68 0.48 0.61
6 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 0.97 < 0.001 < 0.001 0.89 0.02 0.81 0.13 < 0.001 0.01 0.16 0.56 0.57 0.68
7 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 0.08 < 0.001 < 0.001 0.1 0.51 0.13 0.13 < 0.001 < 0.001 0.02 0.39 0.19 0.31
8 0.96 0.21 < 0.001 < 0.001 0.01 0.29 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 0.26 0.01 < 0.001 0.01 0.04
9 0.32 0.92 0.5 0.01 0.9 0.72 0.01 < 0.001 0.01 0.01 < 0.001 0.26 0.26 < 0.001 0.16 0.2
10L 0.02 0.17 0.45 0.16 0.15 0.08 0.12 0.01 0.11 0.16 0.02 0.01 0.26 0.08 0.64 0.64
10R < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 0.5 < 0.001 < 0.001 0.59 0.12 0.68 0.56 0.39 0 < 0.001 0.08 0.38 0.51
11L 0.02 0.11 0.26 0.57 0.11 0.06 0.51 0.12 0.48 0.57 0.19 0.01 0.16 0.64 0.38 0.95
11R 0.04 0.15 0.32 0.69 0.17 0.1 0.64 0.22 0.61 0.68 0.31 0.04 0.2 0.64 0.51 0.95

R right, L left. Note that statistical significant p values are marked in bold.