Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2020 Sep 25;45(4):283–292. doi: 10.1007/s10484-020-09488-7

Table 1.

Heart rate extracted from ECG and MEG channels of 10 different participants

Participant ECG HR MEG HR
P1 68.52 68.51
P2 97.01 97.02
P3 109.56 109.56
P4 68.91 68.91
P5 80.72 80.74
P6 96.75 96.75
P7 93.71 93.71
P8 86.9 86.89
P9 93.91 93.91
P10 70.79 70.79
ICC 1.0

Note: Heart rate extracted from the ECG channel and one MEG channel of 10 different participants. QRS Tool only provides values estimated to two decimal places, so a more precise comparison was not possible. As shown, the heart rate taken from the same participant but from different channels, ECG vs. MEG, was highly congruent. The last row includes Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) of heart rate extracted from the ECG and MEG channels.