Table F2.

Ninety-five percent confidence intervals for heritabilities: h² is the total additive SNP heritability, reexpressed on the liability scale as $h_l^2$ for the qualitative traits (upper section)

Phenotype	${\mathit{h}}_b^2$	${\mathit{h}}_c^2$	${\mathit{h}}_d^2$	h 2	${\mathit{h}}_l^2$
SCZ 2014	[0.16, 0.17]	[0.27, 0.35]	[0.08, 0.09]	[0.52, 0.60]	[0.29, 0.34]
BIP	[0.15, 0.17]	[0.34, 0.39]	—–	[0.50, 0.56]	[0.25, 0.28]
CD	[0.10, 0.10]	[0.36, 0.44]	[0.02, 0.02]	[0.48, 0.56]	[0.22, 0.26]
UC	[0.09, 0.09]	[0.26, 0.33]	[0.02, 0.03]	[0.37, 0.44]	[0.17, 0.20]
CAD	[0.05, 0.05]	[0.03, 0.04]	[0.00, 0.00]	[0.08, 0.10]	[0.07, 0.08]
AD Chr19	[0.00, 0.00]	[0.00, 0.22]	—–	[0.00, 0.22]	[0.00, 0.30]
AD NoC19	[0.02, 0.07]	[0.01, 0.06]	—–	[0.02, 0.13]	[0.03, 0.17]
ALS Chr9	[0.00, 0.01]	[0.00, 0.01]	—–	[0.01, 0.02]	[0.00, 0.01]
Edu	[0.03, 0.06]	[0.02, 0.21]	[0.02, 0.02]	[0.07, 0.28]	—–
IQ 2018	[0.01, 0.02]	[0.05, 0.11]	[0.08, 0.09]	[0.14, 0.22]	—–
Height 2010	[0.08, 0.09]	[0.12, 0.14]	—–	[0.20, 0.23]	—–
Height 2014	[0.08, 0.09]	[0.11, 0.13]	—–	[0.20, 0.22]	—–
Height 2018	[0.04, 0.04]	[0.23, 0.25]	—–	[0.27, 0.29]	—–
HDL	[0.06, 0.06]	[0.01, 0.14]	[0.04, 0.06]	[0.13, 0.25]	—–
LDL	[0.04, 0.05]	[0.03, 0.06]	[0.02, 0.02]	[0.10, 0.13]	—–
BMI GIANT 2015	[0.08, 0.08]	[0.01, 0.01]	—–	[0.08, 0.09]	—–
BMI GIANT-UKB 2018	[0.09, 0.09]	[0.01, 0.01]	—–	[0.09, 0.09]	—–
TC	[0.04, 0.05]	[0.00, 0.27]	[0.02, 0.03]	[0.01, 0.34]	—–

$h_b^2$, $h_c^2$, and $h_d^2$ are the heritabilities associated with the “b,” “c,” and “d” Gaussians, respectively. See Table 3. These confidence intervals are likely underestimates (too narrow), due to linkage disequilibrium and a consequent over-counting of the number of degrees of freedom (independent z-scores).