Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Contextual Behav Sci. 2021 Mar 6;20:52–69. doi: 10.1016/j.jcbs.2021.03.003

Table 2.

Manuscripts reporting studies of single-session ACT interventions for medical populations (K =14)

First author (year) Population/Condition Participant characteristics Study design, setting, intervention duration, assessment schedule Intervention and comparator conditions Outcomes and measures Key Findings
1 Gregg (2007) Adults with diabetes mellitus type 2 N = 81; Mage = 50.9 years; female = 46.9%; white = 23.5%; employment = 10% working full-time, 9% working part-time, 25% unemployed looking for work, 6% unemployed not looking for work, 8% retired, 28% disabled/unable to work; education = 57% with some education greater than High School; income not reported; MBMI = 32.6 Randomized controlled trial; 7-hour workshop; Setting: community health center; Baseline, 3-month FU (1) ACT + Diabetes management education (n = 43)
(2) Diabetes management education (n = 38)
(a) HbA1c
(b) Diabetic Control (HbA1c < 7.0%)
(c) Diabetes self-management (3 self-report items based on exercise, diet, glucose monitoring)
(d) Diabetes acceptance (Acceptance and Action Diabetes Questionnaire/AADQ)
(a) Nonsignificant trend for greater improvement in HbA1c in Group (1) > Group (2) at FU; Cohen’s d = 0.35
(b) Significant increase in rate of diabetic control in Group (1) at FU, p < .01, but not Group (2); Cohen’s d = 0.61
(c) Group (1) increase > Group (2) increase at FU, both p < .05; Cohen’s d = 0.68
(d) Group (1) increase significant (p < .01) and > Group (2) increase at FU; Cohen’s d = 0.78
2 Sheppard (2010) Adults with multiple sclerosis (MS) N = 15; Mage (SD) = 53.13 years (7.68); female = 80%; white = 66.7 %; employment = 46% unemployed or receiving disability payments; education = 60% with Bachelors degree or higher; income not reported Uncontrolled feasibility trial; 5-hour workshop; Setting: local hotel conference venue; Baseline, 3-month FU ACT + MS education (a) Depression (Beck Depression Inventory-II/BDI-II)
(b) Impact of Fatigue (Modified Fatigue Impact Scale/MFIS)
(c) Pain Effects on mood/behavior (Pain Effects Scale/PES)
(d) Physical Health (SF-36)
(e) Mental Health (SF-36)
(f) Quality of Life (Quality of Life Inventory/QOLI)
(g) Thought Suppression (White Bear Suppression Inventory/WBSI)
(h) Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS)
(a) Baseline to FU mean difference = −8.31; Hedge’s g = −0.73
(b) Baseline to FU mean difference = −11.21; Hedge’s g = −0.50
(c) Baseline to FU mean difference = 4.98; Hedge’s g = −0.98
(d) Baseline to FU mean difference for physical health = −0.86; Hedge’s g = −0.10
(e) Baseline to FU mean difference for mental health = 4.23; Hedge’s g = 0.36
(f) Baseline to FU mean difference = 1.11; Hedge’s g = 0.45
(g) Baseline to FU mean difference = 5.35; Hedge’s g = −0.33
(h) Baseline to FU mean difference = 0.22; Hedge’s g = −0.22
3 Dindo (2012) Adults with migraine and depression (current depressive episode) N = 45; Mage (SD) = 32.8 years (13.2); female = 94%; white = 92%; employment = 89% working or in school; education = 89% > 12 years; income not reported Non-randomized controlled pilot trial; 5-hour workshop; Setting: university hospital and clinics; Baseline, 2-, 6-, 12-week FU (1) ACT + migraine psychoeducation (n = 31)
(2) Waitlist/TAU (n = 14)
(a) Depression Sx (Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression/HRSD)
(b) General functioning (World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II/WHODAS) M
(c) Migraine-related disability (Headache Disability Inventory/HDI)
(a) Group (1) decrease > Group (2) decrease at 12-week FU; Cohen’s d = 1.18
(b) Group (1) increase > Group (2) increase at 12-week FU; Cohen’s d = 0.98
(c) Group (1) decrease > Group (2) decrease at 12-week FU; Cohen’s d = 1.03
4 Dindo (2014) Adults with migraine and depression (current depressive episode) N = 45; Mage (SD) = 31.4 years (12.3); female = 94%; white = 87%; employment = 90% working or in school; education = 92% > 12 years; income not reported Non-randomized controlled pilot trial; 5-hour workshop; Setting: university hospital and clinics; Baseline, 2-, 6-, 12-week FU (1) ACT + migraine psychoeducation (n = 38) (2) Waitlist/TAU (n = 22) (a) Headache frequency/severity
(b) Acute headache medication use
(c) Leisure and work disability
(d) Visit to healthcare professional
Note: all outcomes measured using daily headache diary
(a) Group (1) decreased in frequency (OR=0.57) and severity (OR=0.41) at 12-week FU, no change for Group (2) (OR=0.84, 1.0)
(b) Group (1) decreased in acute medication use (OR=0.64) at 12-week FU, no change for Group (2) (OR=0.97)
(c) Group (1) decreased in leisure disability (OR=0.56) and work disability (OR=1.0) at 12-week FU, no change for Group (2) (OR=0.78, 1.8)
(d) At baseline, 20% of Group (1) and 22% of Group (2) attended medical visit in last month; at 12-week FU, 3% of Group (1) and 33% of Group (2)
5 Welch (2014) Adults with diabetes mellitus type 2 with significant distress (either diabetes management regimen distress or emotional burden) N = 31; Mage (SD)= 43 years (9.1); female = 70%; white = 45%; employment status not reported; Myears education (SD) = 13.9 (1.2); income not reported Uncontrolled pilot trial; 8-hour workshop; Setting: psychology graduate school; Baseline, post-treatment, 2-week FU ACT (a) Self-care behavior (Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities scale revised version/SDSCA)
(b) Diabetes-related distress (Diabetes Distress Scale 17/DDS17) total
(c) Diabetes acceptance (AADQ)
(d) Thought suppression (WBSI)
(e) Depression (DASS-21)
(f) Anxiety (DASS-21)
(g) Stress (DASS-21)
(a) Baseline to FU mean difference on subscales:
(1) General diet = 0.82; Cohen’s d = 0.52
(2) Diabetes-specific diet = 0.62; Cohen’s d = 0.61
(3) Exercise = −2.12; Cohen’s d = 1.62
(4) Blood-glucose testing = 0.58; Cohen’s d = 0.29
(5) Foot care = −1.29; Cohen’s d = 0.76
(6) Smoking status = −0.9; Cohen’s d = 0.22
(b) Baseline to FU mean difference on total score = −1.51; Cohen’s d = 1.74
(c) Baseline to FU mean difference = 18.85; Cohen’s d = 1.95
(d) Baseline to FU mean difference = 19.15; Cohen’s d = 1.58
(e) Baseline to FU mean difference = −3.1; Cohen’s d = 0.57
(f) Baseline to FU mean difference = −4.4; Cohen’s d = 0.42
(g) Baseline to FU mean difference = −5.7; Cohen’s d = 0.72
6 Dindo (2015) Adults at risk for vascular disease* with clinically significant anxiety or depression Sx N = 44; Mage = 45 years; female = 67%; white = 74%; employment not reported; education = 70% completed college; income not reported Randomized controlled pilot trial; 6-hour workshop; Setting: university hospital and clinics; Baseline, 12- and 24-week FU (1) ACT + psychoeducation (n = 30)
(2) TAU (n = 14)
(a) General wellbeing (World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF/WHOQOL-BREF) M
(b) Depression (HRSD)
(c) Anxiety (Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety/HSRA)
(d) Psychological Flexibility/decentering (Experiencing Questionnaire/EQ)
(a) In Group (1), all four domains (physical, social, psychological, environment) improved at 24-week FU; in Group (2), only psychological domain was improved
(b) Group (1) decrease > Group (2) decrease at 12- and 24-week FU; unspecified effect size = 1.4 at 24-week FU
(c) Group (1) decrease > Group (2) decrease at 12- and 24-week FU; unspecified effect size = 1.5 at 24-week FU
(d) Increase in Group (1) at unspecified FU; Group (2) results not reported
7 Hou (2017) Adults with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and clinically significant anxiety or depression symptoms N = 20; Mage = 51 years; female = 30%; % white not reported; employment not reported; education not reported; income not reported; n=9 with Crohn’s disease, n=10 with ulcerative colitis, n=1 IBD unclassified Uncontrolled feasibility study; 5-hour workshop; Setting: Veterans Affairs medical center and university medical school; Baseline, 3-month FU ACT + IBD education (a) Health-related Quality of Life (the Short IBD Questionnaire/SIBDQ)
(b) Depression (DASS-21)
(c) Anxiety (DASS-21)
(d) Stress (DASS-21)
(e) IBD activity (Harvey Bradshaw Index for pts. with Crohn’s/HBI)
(f) IBD activity (partial Mayo score for pts with Ulcerative Colitis/pMayo)
(a) Baseline to FU mean difference = 0.5; Hedge’s g = 0.41
(b) Baseline to FU mean difference = −2.1; Hedge’s g = −0.39
(c) Baseline to FU mean difference = −2.6; Hedge’s g = −0.65
(d) Baseline to FU mean difference = −1.9; Hedge’s g = −0.39
(e) Baseline to FU mean difference = −0.5; Hedge’s g = −0.15
(f) Baseline to FU mean difference = −1.2; Hedge’s g = −0.47
8 Dindo (2018) Veterans receiving orthopedic surgery at risk for chronic pain or prolonged opioid use** N = 88; Mage (SD) = 63 years (10); female = 7%; white = 82.5%; employment not reported; education = 68% with some education greater than High School; income not reported Randomized controlled pilot trial; 5-hour workshop; Setting: Veterans Affairs medical center; Baseline and 3-month FU for CPAQ and CPVI; DLPM submitted weekly for 14 weeks post-treatment (1) ACT workshop + 1 individualized “booster” session by phone 2–4 wks following workshop (n = 44)
(2) TAU (n = 44)
(a) Pain cessation (Daily Log of Pain and Pain Medication/ DLPM)
(b) Opioid use/ cessation (DLPM)
(c) Pain acceptance (Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire total/CPAQ)
(d) Values-based behavior (Chronic Pain Values Inventory/ CPVI)
(a) Median days to pain cessation was 66 for Group (1) and 74 for Group (2); HR = 1.42 [95% CI: 0.68, 2.95]
(b) 29% of Group (1) taking opioids at 7 weeks v. 52% of Group (2); HR = 1.44 [95% CI: 0.74, 2.78]
(c) Mean difference between Group (1) and (2) at FU = 2.07 [95% CI: −7.46, 11.61]; HR = 1.42 [95% CI: −7.11, 9.57]
(d) Mean difference between Group (1) and (2) on ‘mean success’ at FU = −0.50 [95% CI: −1.01, 0.01]; HR = 0.13 [95% CI: −0.33, 0.59]; mean difference between Group (1) and (2) on ‘discrepancy score’ at FU = 0.21 [95% CI: −0.23, 0.65]; HR = −0.42 [95% CI = −0.85, 0.01]
9 Ferreira (2018) Adults with refractory Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) N = 79; Mage (SD) = 48 years (13); female = 93%; race/ethnicity not reported; employment not reported; education = 68% with post-secondary education; income not reported. Uncontrolled pilot trial; 6-hour workshop followed by 2 months of bibliotherapy and 2 FU support calls; Setting: gastroenterology outpatient clinic; Enrollment, pre-treatment, post-treatment (2 months following pre-treatment), 6-month FU ACT + IBS education workshop, bibliotherapy, 2 individualized support calls (a) IBS Acceptance (IBS Acceptance and Action Questionnaire; IBSAAQ)
(b) Symptom severity (IBS Symptom Severity Scale; IBSSSS)
(c) Quality of life (IBS Impact on Quality of Life Scale; IBS36)
(d) IBS avoidant behaviors (Behavioural Responses Questionnaire; IBS-BRQ)
(e) Gastrointestinal specific anxiety (Visceral Sensitivity Index; VSI)
(a) Pre- to post-treatment mean difference = 7.24; Cohen’s d = 0.32; Pre-treatment to FU mean difference = 9.82; Cohen’s d = 0.50
(b) Pre- to post-treatment mean difference = −41.48; Cohen’s d = 0.41; Pre-treatment to FU mean difference = −49.78; Cohen’s d = 0.47
(c) Pre- to post-treatment mean difference = −17.41; Cohen’s d = 0.41; Pre-treatment to FU mean difference = −23; Cohen’s d = 0.55
(d) Pre- to post-treatment mean difference = −8.57; Cohen’s d = 0.32; Pre-treatment to FU mean difference = −10.18; Cohen’s d = 0.39
(e) Pre- to post-treatment mean difference = −6.3; Cohen’s d = 0.76; Pre-treatment to FU mean difference = −8.73; Cohen’s d = 1.10
10 Huddleston (2018) Veterans with migraines and co-occurring depression (current depressive episode) N = 32; Age = 36% under 45, 36% 45–55 years, 24% 56–65 years, 1% over 65 years; female = 36%; white = 24%; employment = 25% employed full- or part-time, 6% retired, 34% unemployed, 22% disabled, 13% student; education = 56% with some education greater than High School; income not reported Uncontrolled pilot trial; 5-hour workshop; Setting: Veterans Affairs medical center; Baseline, 3-month FU ACT + migraine education (a) Depression Sx (HRSD)
(b) Anxiety Sx (HRSA)
(c) General functioning (WHO Disability Assessment Schedule II/WHODAS)
(d) Headache-related disability (HDI)
(e) Pain acceptance (CPAQ)
(f) Values-based behavior (CPVI)
(g) Psychological flexibility (Acceptance and Action Questionnaire/AAQ-II)
(a) Baseline to FU mean difference = −7.95; Cohen’s d = −1.93
(b) Baseline to FU mean difference = −6.57; Cohen’s d = −1.84
(c) Baseline to FU mean difference = −5.38; Cohen’s d = −0.38
(d) Baseline to FU mean difference = −7.44; Cohen’s d = −0.39
(e) Baseline to FU mean difference = 8.48; Cohen’s d = 0.48
(f) Baseline to FU mean difference = 0.5; Cohen’s d = 0.48
(g) Baseline to FU mean difference = −5.53; Cohen’s d = −0.71
11 Hadlandsmyth (2019) Adult women undergoing surgery for breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ at risk for persistent postsurgical pain*** N = 62; Mage (SD) = 53 years (12); female = 100%; white = 87%; employment not reported; education not reported; income = 17% <$40,000, 24% $40,000–79,999, 59% $80,000+ Randomized controlled pilot trial; 2-hour individual session 2 weeks post-surgery; Setting: comprehensive cancer center; Baseline, 3-month FU (1) ACT therapy + TAU (n = 24)
(2) TAU (medical care) (n = 30)
(a) Pain intensity (0–10 scale)
(b) Pain catastrophizing (Pain Catastrophizing Scale/PCS)
(c) Depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-8)
(d) Anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7)
(e) Pain acceptance (CPAQ)
(a) At FU, 8.3% in Group (1) reported moderate-to-severe pain v. 13.3% in Group (2); phi = 0.08
(b) At FU, 4.2% in Group (1) reported elevated pain catastrophizing v. 3.3% in Group (2); phi = 0.02
(c) At FU, 12.5% in Group (1) reported elevated depression v. 13.3% in Group (2); phi = 0.01
(d) At FU, 4.2% in Group (1) reported elevated anxiety v. 13.3% in Group (2); phi = 0.16
(e) Mean difference at FU = 1.66, favoring Group (1); Cohen’s d = 0.10
12 Pedersen (2019) Adults with multiple functional somatic syndromes (FSS) N = 121 (for conditions of interest); Mage (SD) = 39 years (9); female = 83%; race/ ethnicity not reported; employment = 26% employed or student, 31% unemployed, 31% disability pension or flexible work; education = 31% greater than basic school (Denmark); income not reported; Functional Somatic Syndromes: 29% Irritable Bowel Syndrome, 79% Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, 74% Fibromyalgia, 74% tension headaches, 55% non-cardiac chest pain; average number of FSS = 3.9 Randomized, controlled, 3-arm trial; Setting: university general hospital; Baseline, 6-, 14, and 20-month FU (1) ACT (6-hour workshop) + Enhanced Care (1–1.5 hour psychoeducation consultation with a physician 1–2 weeks after randomization) (n = 61)
(2) Enhanced Care only (n = 60)
(3) Extended ACT (nine 3-hr group sessions) + Enhanced Care (n = 59)
Note: this review reports results comparing Groups (1) and (2) only
(a) Patient-rated overall health (5-pt clinical global improvement scale/CGI)
(b) Physical Health (SF-36)
(c) Mental Health (SF-36)
Note: total of 18 secondary outcomes assessed, including: depression Sx, anxiety and somatic Sx (Hopkins Symptom Checklist/SCL-92; BDS checklist); illness worry (Whiteley-7); disability (WHODAS 2.0) M
(a) No difference between Groups (1) and (2) at 14-month FU
(b) No difference between Groups (1) and (2), p = .98 at 14-month FU
(c) No difference between Groups (1) and (2), p = .59 at 14-month FU
Note: no significant differences between Groups (1) and (2) in change over time on the 18 secondary outcomes
13 Dindo (2020a) Veterans with chronic pain, mild Traumatic Brain Injury (mTBI), and current diagnosis of MDD, GAD, or PTSD N = 39; Mage (SD) = 36.6 years (6.2); female = 0%; white = 42%; employment = 51% employed full- or part-time; Myears education (SD) = 14.2 (1.7); Past month diagnoses: 68% PTSD, 54% MDD, 16% GAD; most severe TBI = 26% Stage 1 mTBI, 55% Stage 2 mTBI, 19% Stage 3 mTBI Randomized controlled pilot trial; 5-hour workshop; Setting: Veteran Affairs medical center; Baseline, 3-month FU (1) ACT + psychoeducation (n = 20)
(2) TAU (n = 12)
(a) PTSD (Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist; PCL-C)
(b) Depression, Anxiety, and Stress (DASS-21 total)
(c) Reintegration (Military to Civilian Questionnaire/M2C-Q)
(d) Disability (WHODAS 2.0) M
(e) Pain Severity (Brief Pain Inventory/BPI)
(f) Pain Interference (BPI)
(g) Psychological flexibility (AAQ-II)
(a) Group (1) decrease > Group (2) decrease at FU; Cohen’s d = 0.33
(b) Group (1) decrease > Group (2) increase at FU; Cohen’s d = 0.68
(c) Group (1) improved, Group (2) worsened at FU; Cohen’s d = 0.47
(d) Group (1) decrease > Group (2) decrease at FU; Cohen’s d = 0.44
(e) No difference in Group (1) and Group (2) decrease at FU; Cohen’s d = 0.10
(f) Group (2) decrease > Group (1) decrease at FU; Cohen’s d = 0.78
(g) Group (1) increase > Group (2) increase at FU; Cohen’s d = 0.56
14 Dindo (2020b) Adults with migraines and co-occurring depression (current depressive episode) N = 136; Mage (SD) = 35.8 years (13.9); female = 83%; white = 76%; employment = 81% employed or in school; education = 57% with more than 12 years of education; age of onset of migraines M (SD) = 19 (10.6); 31% taking antidepressants; number of migraine/headache days during month prior to baseline M (SD) = 7.4 (3.4); 87% taking abortive anti-migraine medication; 35% taking preventative anti-migraine medication Randomized controlled trial; 5 to 6-hour workshop; Setting: hospital; Baseline, 3-, and 6-month FU (1) ACT + migraine education (n = 56)
(2) Support + migraine education (n = 47)
(a) Depression Sx (Hamilton Rating Scale of Depression/HRSD)
(b) Current depressive episode (depression module of SCID-IV)
(c) Anxiety (Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale/SIGH-A)
(d) Headache-related disability (HDI)
(e) General Functioning (WHODAS 2.0) M
(f) Social relationship functioning (World Health Organization Quality of Life/WHO-QOL)
(g) Environment (WHO-QOL)
(h) Psychological well-being (WHO-QOL)
(i) Physical health (WHO-QOL)
(a) Group (1) proportion of treatment responders > Group (2) at 3-month FU, p < .05, OR = 3.10
(b) Nonsignificant result for group (1) proportion of participants meeting criteria < Group (2) at 3-month FU, p = .33, OR = 0.54
(c) Nonsignificant result for group (1) proportion of treatment responders > Group (2) at 3-month FU, p = .11, OR = 2.45
(d) Group (1) proportion of treatment responders (i.e., ≥ 29 decline in total score) mean decrease > Group (2) at 3-month FU, p < .05, OR = 4.47
(e) Nonsignificant difference in mean improvement at 3-month FU, p = .23, Cohen’s d = 0.33
(f) Group (1) increase > Group (2) increase at 3-month FU, p = .01, Cohen’s d = 0.62
(g) Group (1) increase > Group (2) increase at 3-month FU, p = .05, Cohen’s d = 0.47
(h) Nonsignificant trend for Group (1) increase > Group (2) increase at 3-month FU, p = .06, Cohen’s d = 0.46
(i) Nonsignificant difference in mean increase at 3-month FU, p = .40, Cohen’s d = 0.27

Note. N reflects the number of participants randomized (for studies with > 1 condition) or assigned to treatment (for single-arm studies); FU = follow-up; Sx = symptoms; M = mean; SD = standard deviation; TAU = treatment as usual; OR = odds ratio; HR = hazard ratio; SCID-IV = Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV; PTSD = posttraumatic stress disorder; MDD = major depressive disorder; GAD = generalized anxiety disorder. Unable to calculate effect sizes for Pedersen (2019). Effect sizes reported for studies with comparison conditions are between-group effects; effect sizes reported those studies without comparison conditions are within-group effects.

Subsample from Dindo (2012) study, focused on headache outcomes

*

At-risk defined as having hypertension, diabetes mellitus or impaired fasting glucose, dyslipidemia, or obesity

**

At-risk defined as having high levels of preoperative pain and clinically significant anxiety or depression

***

At-risk defined as under the age of 50, having a preexisting chronic pain condition, elevated anxiety, elevated depression, or elevated pain catastrophizing, assessed pre-surgery

M

Included in meta-analysis