Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 14;16(4):e0248780. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248780

Table 1. Main features of individual projects.

RPP EERP ML2 SSRP Pooled data
Replication Study Ref [12] Ref [6] Ref [10] Ref [7]
Forecasting Study Ref [19] Ref [25]
Field of study Experimental Psychology Experimental Economics Experimental Psychology Experimental Social Science
Source Journals JPSP, PS, JEP (2008) AER, QJE (2011–2014) Several psychology outlets, including JEP, JPSP, PS (1977–2014) Science, Nature (2010–2015)
Replicated Findings 40 18 24 21 103
Successful replications 15 (37.5%) 11 (61.1%) 11 (45.8%) 13 (61.9%) 51 (49%)
Mean beliefs—Prediction Market 0.556 0.751 0.644 0.634 0.627
Correct–Prediction Markets (%) 28(70%) 11 (61%) 18 (75%) 18 (86%) 76 (73%)
Mean Absolute Error–Prediction Market 0.431 0.414 0.354 0.303 0.384
Mean beliefs—survey 0.546 0.711 0.647 0.605 0.610
Correct—Survey (%) 23 (58%) 11 (61%) 16 (67%) 18 (86%) 68 (66%)
Spearman Correlation–Prediction Market and Survey beliefs 0.736 0.792 0.947 0.845 0.837
Spearman Correlation–Replication Outcomes and Prediction Market 0.418 0.297 0.755 0.842 0.568
Spearman Correlation–Replication Outcomes and Survey beliefs 0.243 0.516 0.731 0.760 0.557

This table contains key characteristics and summaries of the datasets and the pooled data. In calculations of correct forecasts by the prediction market and survey, we interpreted a final price of 0.50 or greater as prediction of a successful replication; if the final price is lower than 0.50, we interpret this as prediction of a failed replication. Overall, the actual replication rate was 49%, indicating that the forecasters were overconfident with the average market price being 0.627. Prediction Markets tend to outperform survey’s when forecasting replication success when considering overall accuracy– 73% compared to 66%.