. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 May 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Magn Reson Imaging. 2020 Dec 31:10.1002/jmri.27473. doi: 10.1002/jmri.27473

Table 2.

Precision of the parameters are compared using coefficient of variation (CV), reported as percentage and the normalized RMSE (nRMSE). Each row reports on model fitting results obtained from data before applying any correction (no correction) and after applying both distortion and motion correction (Di+MoCo). The coefficient of variation for all parameters and residuals were smallest after applying Di+MoCo.

Model param CV (%) / method		No correction	Di+MoCo
IVIM	CV Slow diff. (D) [%]	16.98+/−4.63	14.72+/−5.52
	*CV Fast diff. (D) [%]**	58.15+/−28.19	46.91+/−9.79
	CV Perf. Frac, (f) [%]	34.62+/−15.25	30.49+/−7.34
	nRMSE	0.30+/−0.05	0.17+/−0.05
DTI	CV MD [%]	6.50+/−1.25	3.28+/−1.17
	CV FA [%]	14.51+/−1.67	12.09+/−2.31
	nRMSE	0.35+/−0.06	0.12+/−0.02