Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 1;8:637301. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2021.637301

Table 3.

Table highlighting the difference in median error as a % of ROM between HO with E-WAM and HO with WAM.

Number of sensors 2 3 4 5 6
HO with E-WAM median error as % of ROM 7.561 4.504 3.090 2.342 1.914
HO with WAM median error as % of ROM 1.552 0.261 0.0915 0.0434 0.0366
Decrease in median error as % of ROM 6.009 4.243 2.9985 2.2986 1.8774

The bold values shown in the table highlight the improvements between the two methods being compared.