Table 3.
Table highlighting the difference in median error as a % of ROM between HO with E-WAM and HO with WAM.
Number of sensors | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
HO with E-WAM median error as % of ROM | 7.561 | 4.504 | 3.090 | 2.342 | 1.914 |
HO with WAM median error as % of ROM | 1.552 | 0.261 | 0.0915 | 0.0434 | 0.0366 |
Decrease in median error as % of ROM | 6.009 | 4.243 | 2.9985 | 2.2986 | 1.8774 |
The bold values shown in the table highlight the improvements between the two methods being compared.