TABLE 5.
Classification performance of different methods.
| Method | ACC (%) ± STD | SEN (%) ± STD | SPE (%) ± STD | AUC ± STD |
| PC (Jiang et al., 2019) | 81.0570 ± 0.2551 | 77.2975 ± 0.3529 | 86.4165 ± 0.3682 | 0.8986 ± 0.0026 |
| SR (Jiang et al., 2019) | 73.9135 ± 0.2756 | 68.7518 ± 0.3423 | 79.0753 ± 0.5537 | 0.8237 ± 0.0009 |
| MR (Li et al., 2020c) | 49.8402 ± 1.1050 | 96.3184 ± 5.3426 | 3.3620 ± 4.3518 | 0.8291 ± 0.0404 |
| SMR (Li et al., 2020c) | 74.3410 ± 0.3876 | 68.9902 ± 0.4506 | 79.6918 ± 0.5397 | 0.8275 ± 0.0022 |
| HMR | 81.4570 ± 0.2727 | 76.6237 ± 0.3087 | 86.2903 ± 0.3670 | 0.9005 ± 0.0017 |
| SHMR | 82.4946 ± 0.2827 | 77.2473 ± 0.5747 | 87.7419 ± 0.2286 | 0.9021 ± 0.0007 |