Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 28;18(3):204–209. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2021.03.011

Table 3. Crude and adjusted logistic regression models to assess the associations between LDL-C levels and the outcomes of haemorrhagic stroke.

Crude ORs Age/sex adjusted ORs Multivariate adjusted ORs
AIS: acute ischaemic stroke; CI: confidence interval; DM: diabetes mellitus; F: female; LDL-C: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; M: male; mRS: modified Rankin Scale; NIHSS: National Institute of Health Scale; OR: odds ratio; TIA: transient ischaemic attack.
Baseline NIHSS scores ≥ 15
 LDL-C 70 to < 100 vs. < 70 mg/dL 0.29 (0.15−0.55) 0.30 (0.15−0.57) 0.29 (0.15−0.57)
 LDL-C ≥ 100 vs. < 70 mg/dL 0.26 (0.15−0.47) 0.28 (0.15−0.51) 0.27 (0.15−0.51)
 Age 1.02 (1.00−1.03) 1.01 (1.00−1.04)
 M vs. F 0.82 (0.50−1.36) 0.82 (0.49−1.36)
 Prior mRS scores: 2−5vs.0−1 1.95 (0.71−5.34)
 DM vs. non-DM 0.81 (0.45−1.47)
 Prior AIS/TIA: yes vs. no 0.93 (0.48−1.81)
mRS scores at discharge > 2
 LDL-C: 70 to < 100 vs. < 70 mg/dL 0.48 (0.28−0.82) 0.50 (0.29−0.87) 0.88 (0.47−1.70)
 LDL-C: ≥ 100 vs. < 70 mg/dL 0.43 (0.26−0.71) 0.46 (0.28−0.78) 0.81 (0.44−1.50)
 Age 1.02 (1.01−1.03) 1.01 (1.00−1.03)
 M vs. F 1.01 (0.70−1.45) 1.06 (0.71−1.57)
 Prior mRS scores: 2−5vs. 0−1 5.20 (1.77−15.25)
 DM vs. non-DM 1.04 (0.65−1.65)
 Prior AIS/TIA: yes vs. no 1.06 (0.63−1.78)
 Initial NIHSS scores: ≥ 15 vs. 0−14 14.66 (7.29−29.46)