Skip to main content
. 2021 May;11(5):1805–1816. doi: 10.21037/qims-20-659

Table 4. Predictive performance of different methods for predicting LN metastasis.

Methods AUC (95% CI) Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) PPV (%) NPV (%)
mrLN (morphology) 0.581 (0.457–0.698) 60.9 55.3 40.0 74.3
mrLN (CSE) 0.708 (0.587–0.811) 56.5 85.1 65.0 80.0
Energy_T1 map 0.838 (0.731–0.915) 87.0 78.7 66.7 92.5
mrLN (CSE) + energy_T1 map 0.858 (0.754–0.930) 91.3 70.2 60.0 94.3
mrLN (CSE) + energy_T1 map + mrEMVI 0.895 (0.798–0.955) 82.6 87.2 76.0 91.1

LN, lymph node; AUC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; CI, confidence interval; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value; mrLN, LN on MRI; CSE, chemical shift effect; mrEMVI, extramural venous invasion on MRI.