Skip to main content
. 2021 May;11(5):1751–1762. doi: 10.21037/qims-20-622

Table 2. Results of imaging features of AWE before HIFU procedure.

Variables N (%) Mean ± SD
Diagnostic modality
   Ultrasonography 67 (100)
   MRI 8 (11.94)
Nodule location
   To the left of the scar 31 (37.81)
   At the middle of the scar 19 (23.17)
   To the right of the scar 32 (39.02)
Texture of nodules
   Homogeneous hypo-echo 76 (92.68)
   Heterogeneous hypo-echo 4 (4.88)
   Hyper-echo 2 (2.44)
Degree of activity
   High 9 (10.98)
   Low 73 (89.02)
Adhesions to the surrounding tissue
   Subcutaneous fat layer and rectus 63 (76.83)
   Subcutaneous fat layer 15 (18.29)
   Fascial 4 (4.89)
Thickness of the rectus, mm* 11.3±6.65
Thickness of the fat, mm 23.3±6.65
Number of nodules
   Single nodule 54 (65.85)
   Two nodules 7 (8.54)
   Three nodules 6 (7.32)

*, P<0.01, Student’s t-tests. AWE, abdominal wall endometriosis; HIFU, high-intensity focused ultrasound; SD, standard deviation; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.