Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 2;7(4):e06634. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06634

Table 4.

Sensory evaluation of garlic samples (means and standard deviations).

Samples Intensity sd Pungency sd Persistence sd Sulphurous sd Vinegarish sd Cooked onion sd
WOC 5.67b 0.52 4.83a 0.75 4.67b 0.52 3.67b 0.52 4.67a 0.52 3.67b 0.52
WAC 6.67a 0.52 5.05a 0.82 5.17a 0.75 5.00a 0.63 2.67b 0.82 5.67a 0.82
WAR
6.50a
0.55
4.90a
0.55
5.50a
0.52
5.33a
0.52
3.00b
0.89
5.83a
0.98
BOC 4.17b 0.75 2.50a 1.22 4.50a 0.55 4.20a 0.63 3.80a 0.55 2.45b 0.75
BAC 5.17a 0.75 2.83a 0.75 4.33a 0.52 4.90a 0.75 2.50b 0.54 3.33a 0.66
BAR
5.33a
0.52
3.20a
0.52
3.67b
0.82
4.50a
0.55
2.50b
0.62
3.67a
0.59
NOC 4.37a 0.48 3.00a 0.84 3.50a 0.77 5.00a 0.63 2.05a 0.77 3.50a 0.55
NAC 4.38a 0.56 2.90a 0.73 3.83a 0.88 4.67b 0.88 1.83a 0.41 4.00a 0.63
NAR 4.35a 0.49 2.83a 0.74 3.00a 0.74 4.50b 0.55 1.67a 0.52 4.83a 0.75

Different lowercase letters indicate significant difference among treatments (P < 0.05).