Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 15;19(1):805–817. doi: 10.1007/s40201-021-00648-3

Table 2.

The QNFT results of studied respirators compared to the brand 2 by the repeated measurements

Respirator code QNFT result (n = 37) Mean ± SD
of FFs
95% CI for Mean of FFs 95th Percentile of FFs 95% CI for 95th Percentile of FFs pa Overall
p
Passed
N (%)
Failed
N (%)
Lower Upper Lower Upper
1 1(2.70) 36(97.30) 23.24 ± 27.33 16.41 34.24 61 34 170 <0.001 <0.001
2 16(43.20) 21(56.80) 110.49 ± 72.20 87.94 133.78 200 200 200
3 6(16.22) 31(83.78) 62.62 ± 39.33 50.59 74.38 151 101.01 160 >0.05
4 10(27) 27(73.0) 59.84 ± 52.51 43.32 76.64 180 140 180 >0.05
5 2(5.41) 35(94.59) 26.76 ± 24.09 20.16 35.03 100 50.60 100 <0.001
6 3(8.11) 34(91.89) 31.05 ± 30.46 22.16 41.51 104 54 140 <0.001
7 6(16.22) 31(83.78) 53.51 ± 47.21 39.52 70.24 155 101 200 >0.05
8 5(13.51) 32(86.49) 42.70 ± 44.01 29.24 56.81 144 100.40 180 <0.001
9 2(5.40) 35(94.59) 30.51 ± 28.28 22.17 40.51 106 60 115 <0.001
10 2(5.40) 35(94.59) 11.39 ± 22.21 5.76 19.23 100 20 100 <0.001
11 3(8.10) 34(91.89) 18.43 ± 27.60 10.73 27.43 102 25.50 120 <0.001
12 3(8.10) 34(91.89) 13.51 ± 26.17 5.89 23.40 100 10 100 <0.001
13 0 37 (100) 4.84 ± 2.46 4.08 5.62 9.10 8.10 10 <0.001
14 4(10.81) 33(89.19) 18.38 ± 29.04 10.27 28.08 100 23.50 100 <0.001
15 4(10.81) 33(89.19) 24.70 ± 31.68 15.94 35.57 120 39 120 <0.001
16 0 37(100) 6.48 ± 2.51 5.07 7.30 12 9.0 12 <0.001
17 0 37(100) 5.08 ± 2.16 4.43 5.79 9.10 7.30 10 <0.001
18 3(8.10) 34(91.89) 21.40 ± 25.87 14.19 30.37 100.50 34 105 <0.001
19 6(16.22) 31(83.78) 29.40 ± 36.46 18.38 41.75 106.50 100 120 <0.001
20 10(27.0) 27(73.0) 110.73 ± 207.04 51.62 186.92 670.90 464.90 760 >0.05

QNFT Quantitative Fit Test

FF Fit Factor

SD Standard Deviation

CI Confidence Interval

a Mean FFs of all studied respirators compared to that of the brand 2 (as the best fitting respirator evaluated in this study)