Table 3.
Composite mean and SD per latent variable.a
Latent variable | Mean (SD) | Minimum | Maximum |
Intention to use AALb | 3.34 (0.73) | 1 | 5 |
Attitude toward using AAL | 3.73 (0.78) | 1 | 5 |
Social norm | 3.67 (0.57) | 1 | 5 |
Personal norm | 3.42 (0.75) | 1 | 5 |
Perceived behavioral control | 3.32 (0.71) | 1 | 5 |
Safe and independent living | 3.92 (0.52) | 1 | 5 |
Relief of family burden | 3.67 (0.65) | 1 | 5 |
Loss of privacy | 3.14 (0.87) | 1 | 5 |
Loss of human touch | 3.13 (0.83) | 1 | 5 |
Caregiver influence | 3.73 (0.56) | 1 | 5 |
Human touch norm | 3.97 (0.67) | 1 | 5 |
Personal innovativeness | 3.19 (0.78) | 1 | 5 |
Self-efficacy | 3.79 (0.60) | 1 | 5 |
Reliability | 3.26 (0.59) | 1 | 5 |
Financial cost | 3.81 (0.68) | 1 | 5 |
aSingle imputation with the Expectation Maximization method was used to handle the missing data for the composite scores and group comparison.
bAAL: ambient assisted living.