Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Mar 12.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Sci (Lond). 2021 Mar 12;135(5):671–681. doi: 10.1042/CS20201573

Table 8:

Options journal editors can consider to encourage good citation practices

Options for Journals Rationale
The Instructions for Authors should include detailed guidelines, with recommendations for citing literature (for example, see “Recommendations for Authors” table) Citation skills are rarely taught. Many authors are unaware of best practices.
Consider new policies and practices
  • 1

    When submitting, ask authors to declare that they have checked all references for accuracy and have used primary references instead of indirect or secondary references

Emphasizes the need for good citation practices (26)
  • 2

    Restrict the number of references

May make it easier for authors to maintain an overview of what they cite (14,27,28)
  • 3

    Encourage editors and reviewers to check selected references

Random checks by editorial staff may remind authors about the importance of citation accuracy. Editors: (13,27); Reviewers: (17,29)
  • 4

    Inform authors that citation accuracy is expected and checked

Shows that the editorial staff is committed to good citation practices (26)
  • 5

    Institute a misquotations column to present cases of citation errors

Raise awareness of the consequences of inaccurate citations (28,30)
  • 6

    Editors may consider whether certain statements really need one or more than one reference, particularly in discussion sections

Pressure to have a citation for every statement may increase the risk that authors include unnecessary or inappropriate citations (31)